In the following sentence, some part may have an error. Identify the part that contains a grammatical or usage error, or select No Error if the sentence is correct: At this moment that (1) terrible door burst noisily open and (2) banged for the wall. (3) No Error (4).

Introduction / Context:
This error spotting question tests your understanding of correct preposition use and natural collocations in English. The sentence describes a dramatic moment when a terrible door bursts open and then hits a wall. While the overall structure is understandable, one part uses an incorrect preposition, which makes the sentence sound unnatural and grammatically wrong. Identifying such subtle errors is important for scoring well in competitive examinations.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Sentence divided into parts: At this moment that (1) terrible door burst noisily open and (2) banged for the wall. (3) No Error (4).• Options 1, 2, 3, and 4 correspond to different segments.• We assume standard British or Indian English usage.• Only one part contains a clear grammatical or usage error.

Concept / Approach:
When we describe one thing hitting another, English usually uses the preposition against, as in banged against the wall, knocked against the door, or crashed against the rocks. The preposition for is not used in this context. Therefore, the phrase banged for the wall is incorrect; the natural phrase is banged against the wall. We must locate the part that contains this incorrect preposition usage, which is part 3, and mark that as the error.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Examine part 1 At this moment that. This phrase is slightly dramatic but grammatically acceptable as a narrative opening.Step 2: Examine part 2 terrible door burst noisily open and. The verb burst open and the adverb noisily are correctly used here.Step 3: Examine part 3 banged for the wall. Here, the verb banged should be followed by the preposition against when describing a collision with the wall.Step 4: Recognise that for is incorrect in this collocation; correct English would be banged against the wall.Step 5: Therefore, the error lies in part 3.Step 6: Select option 3 as the answer, which corresponds to part 3.

Verification / Alternative check:
Try reading the corrected version: At this moment that terrible door burst noisily open and banged against the wall. This version sounds natural and matches standard usage found in literature and everyday speech. No other part of the sentence requires correction for basic grammar, so it is reasonable to conclude that part 3 alone contains the error through the incorrect preposition for.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Part 1 At this moment that sets the scene and, though slightly stylistic, does not break core grammar rules. Part 2 terrible door burst noisily open and correctly uses burst open to describe sudden opening accompanied by noise. Part 4 No Error is meant for sentences that are completely correct, which is not the case here because part 3 clearly misuses for. Therefore, options 1, 2, and 4 are not appropriate answers.

Common Pitfalls:
Learners sometimes focus too much on dramatic adjectives like terrible and may suspect them unnecessarily, ignoring the real grammatical issue. Another common mistake is to overlook prepositions, which are small words but very important for natural English. Developing a habit of reading widely helps build a sense of which preposition normally follows which verb, making such questions easier over time.

Final Answer:
The part that contains the error is 3, because the phrase should be banged against the wall, not banged for the wall.