Low-loss line identity — geometric-mean relation For a (low-loss) transmission line section, the characteristic impedance satisfies Z0 = sqrt(Zoc * Zsc). State whether this relation is true or false.

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: True

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
When measuring an unknown transmission line, one classic method uses its input impedance under open-circuit and short-circuit terminations. For a uniform low-loss section, there is a convenient identity relating these two measurements to the characteristic impedance Z0. This question asks whether that identity is valid.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Uniform, low-loss line section at a given frequency.
  • Measured input impedances: Z_oc (with load open) and Z_sc (with load short).


Concept / Approach:
The transmission-line input impedance formula yields, after algebraic manipulation for open and short cases, a product relation. Under the low-loss assumption, magnitudes (or complex values near the real axis) satisfy:

Z0 = sqrt(Z_oc * Z_sc)

This serves as a practical way to extract Z0 from bench measurements without directly accessing internal L and C values.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Write Z_in(l) for arbitrary load; specialize to open and short cases.2) Multiply Z_oc and Z_sc; simplify using standard identities for tanh(γl) in the low-loss limit where γ ≈ jβ.3) Take square root to isolate Z0.


Verification / Alternative check:
Laboratory practice frequently uses the geometric-mean method as a quick Z0 check for low-loss cables and waveguide sections.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • False: would reject a well-established identity used in RF measurements; deviations occur only when losses are non-negligible or measurements are off-frequency for the assumed electrical length.


Common Pitfalls:
Applying the identity to highly lossy lines without correction; confusing magnitudes with complex values when significant attenuation is present.


Final Answer:
True

More Questions from Microwave Communication

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion