Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: True
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In circuit theory, 3×3 determinants appear when solving three simultaneous equations (e.g., three-node nodal analysis with Cramer’s rule). Knowing standard evaluation methods speeds up hand calculations and checks.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
“Expansion method” typically refers to expanding along a row or column using minors; the “cofactor method” is the same approach stated formally with signs (cofactors). Thus the statement is correct. One may also use Sarrus’ rule for 3×3, or convert to triangular form via elimination and multiply diagonal elements, but the assertion remains accurate as written.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Cross-verify with Sarrus’ shortcut for 3×3 matrices to ensure numerical consistency in practice.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“False” contradicts standard linear algebra. Claiming “only Gaussian elimination is valid” ignores many correct analytical methods.
Common Pitfalls:
Forgetting the checkerboard sign pattern of cofactors; arithmetic slips when computing minors; misapplying Sarrus to non-3×3 cases.
Final Answer:
True.
Discussion & Comments