Multi-element parts in schematics: For clarity and routing simplicity, should sections of multi-element parts (for example, a dual op-amp or quad logic gate) be drawn as separate schematic symbols?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Correct

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Many packages contain multiple identical elements, such as quad op-amps or quad NAND gates. Presenting each element as its own symbol improves readability and routing logic by placing each function where it is used in the circuit.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • The package comprises multiple identical or related elements.
  • Each element can be instantiated as A, B, C, D units.
  • Pin numbers and power pins are managed appropriately.


Concept / Approach:
Splitting multi-element parts allows logical locality: each amplifier stage appears alongside its surrounding passives. Power pins may be shown once in a separate power symbol to reduce clutter. CAD tools maintain the package linkage to ensure the PCB uses a single physical part.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Instantiate separate unit symbols (e.g., U1A, U1B, U1C, U1D).Place each unit near its associated circuitry for clarity.Show power pins either on each unit or in a dedicated power unit per library conventions.Validate the netlist ensures all units map to the same footprint.


Verification / Alternative check:

Run an electrical rules check to confirm all units in the package are used and correctly powered.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

Incorrect: Keeping the entire multi-element package in one block often reduces clarity.Allowed only for digital ICs / Valid only on single-sheet: The practice is common across analog and digital, single- or multi-sheet projects.


Common Pitfalls:

Forgetting to connect power pins when shown separately.Reusing the same unit designator twice, causing netlist conflicts.


Final Answer:

Correct

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion