Stored procedure languages in SQL Server 2000:\nEvaluate the statement:\n\n"The .NET languages are the most popular languages for writing stored procedures in SQL Server 2000."

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Incorrect

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
SQL Server 2000 predates the Common Language Runtime (CLR) integration in the database engine. CLR stored procedures (using .NET languages like C#) were introduced later in SQL Server 2005. In SQL Server 2000, stored procedures were written in Transact-SQL (T-SQL) or as extended stored procedures in unmanaged DLLs, not in .NET languages.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Product version is SQL Server 2000.
  • No CLR integration is available inside the database engine in this version.
  • Extended stored procedures (xp_*) are C/C++ DLLs—unmanaged, not .NET.


Concept / Approach:
The assertion that .NET languages were commonly used in 2000 is historically inaccurate. T-SQL was the standard stored procedure language. Developers could build external middle-tier services in .NET after its release, but that is separate from in-database stored procedures. Therefore, the statement is false for SQL Server 2000 specifically.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Check version capabilities: SQL 2000 supports T-SQL procedures.Note introduction of CLR integration: SQL Server 2005 (CREATE ASSEMBLY, CREATE PROCEDURE EXTERNAL NAME ...).Conclude that .NET procedures were not a feature of SQL Server 2000.


Verification / Alternative check:
Review official feature lists per version; confirm absence of CREATE ASSEMBLY in SQL 2000 syntax.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Service packs/editions did not add CLR integration to 2000.
  • Extended stored procedures used native code, not managed .NET.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing application-tier .NET code with server-side stored procedures; assuming backward availability of features across versions.


Final Answer:
Incorrect

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion