Stored procedure languages in SQL Server 2000: Evaluate the statement: "The .NET languages are the most popular languages for writing stored procedures in SQL Server 2000."
-
AIncorrect
-
BCorrect
-
CCorrect only with Service Pack 4
-
DCorrect only on 64-bit editions
-
ECorrect for extended stored procedures only
Answer
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation
Introduction / Context: SQL Server 2000 predates the Common Language Runtime (CLR) integration in the database engine. CLR stored procedures (using .NET languages like C#) were introduced later in SQL Server 2005. In SQL Server 2000, stored procedures were written in Transact-SQL (T-SQL) or as extended stored procedures in unmanaged DLLs, not in .NET languages.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Product version is SQL Server 2000.
- No CLR integration is available inside the database engine in this version.
- Extended stored procedures (xp_*) are C/C++ DLLs—unmanaged, not .NET.
Concept / Approach: The assertion that .NET languages were commonly used in 2000 is historically inaccurate. T-SQL was the standard stored procedure language. Developers could build external middle-tier services in .NET after its release, but that is separate from in-database stored procedures. Therefore, the statement is false for SQL Server 2000 specifically.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Check version capabilities: SQL 2000 supports T-SQL procedures.Note introduction of CLR integration: SQL Server 2005 (CREATE ASSEMBLY, CREATE PROCEDURE EXTERNAL NAME ...).Conclude that .NET procedures were not a feature of SQL Server 2000.Verification / Alternative check: Review official feature lists per version; confirm absence of CREATE ASSEMBLY in SQL 2000 syntax.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Service packs/editions did not add CLR integration to 2000.
- Extended stored procedures used native code, not managed .NET.
Common Pitfalls: Confusing application-tier .NET code with server-side stored procedures; assuming backward availability of features across versions.
Final Answer: Incorrect