Logical Evaluation of Conclusions – Popularity abroad vs. at home Statements: “The best evidence of India’s glorious past is the growing popularity of Ayurvedic medicines in the West.” Conclusions: I. Ayurvedic medicines are not popular in India. II.

Question

Solve this multiple-choice question and choose the correct option.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context:This question asks whether conclusions about domestic popularity follow from a statement about growing popularity in the West. It is a test of avoiding scope creep: conclusions must remain within what the statement actually says. Given Data / Assumptions: Claim: Popularity of Ayurveda is rising in the West. No data are given about popularity within India or about relative popularity versus allopathy. We cannot import unstated comparisons. Concept / Approach:From “popularity increasing in the West,” nothing definitive about popularity inside India logically follows. Similarly, nothing about the relative popularity of Ayurveda vs. allopathy in India is stated. Hence neither conclusion is compelled. Step-by-Step Solution: Check Conclusion I: “Not popular in India.” The premise is silent on India; cannot conclude.Check Conclusion II: “Allopathy more popular in India.” Again, no support in the premise.Therefore, neither I nor II follows. Verification / Alternative check: Construct examples: Ayurveda could be popular both in India and the West, or only in the West, or neither—premise doesn’t tell. Thus the conclusions are not necessary. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Any option asserting I or II draws an inference beyond the scope of the statement. Common Pitfalls: Assuming that growth abroad implies weakness at home; this is a non sequitur. Final Answer:Neither I nor II follows

More Questions from Statement and Conclusion

Discussion & Comments