Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: designer's intent
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Drafters deal with countless details: dimensions, tolerances, views, layers, and sheet formats. Yet one element governs them all—the designer's intent. Drawings are a language for manufacturing and inspection; if the intent is not preserved, the part may be made correctly to the numbers but wrong for the function.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Designer's intent defines what matters: which features are functionally critical, what datums control assembly alignment, and where tolerances must be tight versus generous. A drafter must reflect this using appropriate views, GD&T, notes, and dimensioning schemes. Sheet size and scale factor are secondary choices driven by readability; they do not by themselves guarantee functional communication.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Perform a tolerance stack or assembly simulation to verify that the communicated scheme produces the intended outcome. Review with design, manufacturing, and quality to ensure intent is consistently understood.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Optimizing for neatness or minimal dimension count while losing the datum strategy that captures how the part assembles and performs. Always let design intent drive every drafting decision.
Final Answer:
designer's intent
Discussion & Comments