Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Under reversible conditions, the adiabatic work is less than isothermal work.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Comparing different processes for ideal gases (isothermal vs. adiabatic) and understanding state vs. path functions are foundational for cycle analysis and equipment design (compressors, expanders, engines).
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
For a reversible expansion from the same initial state to the same final volume, the isothermal path has higher pressures at any intermediate volume than the adiabatic path; thus the area under the P–V curve (work by the gas) is larger for the isothermal case. Therefore, reversible adiabatic work (by the gas) is less than reversible isothermal work to the same V2. Also, reversible work magnitude exceeds irreversible work for the same endpoints. Finally, heat and work are path functions, whereas enthalpy and entropy are state functions.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Using ideal-gas formulas, W_rev,isothermal = nRT ln(V2/V1), whereas W_rev,adiabatic = (P1V1 − P2V2)/(γ − 1). For the same V2/V1, the isothermal work is larger.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Comparing to the same final pressure instead of the same final volume; mixing up sign conventions for work.
Final Answer:
Under reversible conditions, the adiabatic work is less than isothermal work.
Discussion & Comments