In transforming an ER model to a relational schema, each entity type is typically represented as which relational structure?

Introduction / Context:
ER modeling precedes relational design. The standard mapping is straightforward: entities become tables; attributes become columns; and relationships become foreign keys (or associative tables). Understanding this mapping accelerates consistent, maintainable schemas.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• An ER diagram defines one or more entity types with attributes.
• Target platform is a relational DBMS.
• We want a normalized first-cut schema.

Concept / Approach:
An entity becomes a table. Each table carries columns corresponding to the entity's attributes and a primary key that implements the entity's identifier. Relationships translate into foreign keys or, for many-to-many, into separate associative (junction) tables.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Review that each table aligns to a single theme (3NF-friendly) and that all relationships are representable via keys.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• Tuple: A tuple is a row, not an entire entity set.
• Attribute: Attributes become columns, not standalone entities.
• File: A storage concept outside relational modeling.
• View: A derived, virtual table; entities map to base tables.

Common Pitfalls:
Combining multiple entities in one table creates update anomalies. Keep one entity per table to maintain clarity and normalization.

Final Answer:
table