Option B is incorrect because any literal number with a decimal point u declare the computer will implicitly cast to double unless you include "F or f"
Option C is incorrect because it is a String.
Option D is incorrect because "d" tells the computer it is a double so therefore you are trying to put a double value into a float variable i.e there might be a loss of precision.
(3) - This is a Java keyword
(1) - Is incorrect because although it is a method of Thread/Runnable it is not a keyword
(4) - This is not a Java keyword the keyword is implements
/* Missing Statement? */ public class foo { public static void main(String[]args)throws Exception { java.io.PrintWriter out = new java.io.PrintWriter(); new java.io.OutputStreamWriter(System.out,true); out.println("Hello"); } }
(3), (5), (7), and (8) are incorrect answers. The methods isInterrupted() and interrupt() are instance methods of Thread.
The methods sleep() and yield() are static methods of Thread.
D is incorrect because synchronized is a keyword and the synchronized() construct is part of the Java language.
class X implements Runnable { public static void main(String args[]) { /* Missing code? */ } public void run() {} }
(5) is correct because sleep() will always pause the currently running thread for at least the duration specified in the sleep argument (unless an interrupted exception is thrown).
(6) is correct because, assuming that the thread you're calling join() on is alive, the thread calling join() will immediately block until the thread you're calling join() on is no longer alive.
(1) is wrong, but tempting. The yield() method is not guaranteed to cause a thread to leave the running state, although if there are runnable threads of the same priority as the currently running thread, then the current thread will probably leave the running state.
(3) and (4) are incorrect because they don't cause the thread invoking them to leave the running state.
(7) is wrong because there's no such method.
(3), (4), and (5) are not legal Thread constructors, although (4) is close. If you reverse the arguments in (4), you'd have a valid constructor.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.