Comparison and advertising claim analysis: Coffee powder of company X tastes better than heavily advertised company Y — determine which assumption is implicit about advertising influence

Given data

• Statement: Coffee powder of company X tastes better than the much-advertised coffee of company Y.
• Assumption I: If a product is not good, one spends more on advertisement.
• Assumption II: Some people are tempted to buy by advertisements.

Concept/Approach

The mention of 'much advertised' is relevant only if advertising can sway buyers; otherwise the comparison of taste would not need to reference advertising at all.

Step-by-Step reasoning
1) The statement contrasts true quality (taste) with market push (heavy ads). This presupposes that ads influence buyer behavior; thus II is implicit.2) I is a sweeping generalization about bad products advertising more; the statement does not need that to claim better taste. Hence I is not implicit.

Verification/Alternative

Even good products advertise; the argument only needs the weaker belief that ads can attract buyers, not that only inferior products rely on them.

Common pitfalls

• Reading a universal rule into a marketing observation.

Final Answer
Only assumption II is implicit.