The statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : All wheat are grain. Statement 2 : Some wheat are flour. Conclusion I : Some grain are flour. Conclusion II : Some flour are wheat.
1. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : Some wild are carnivores. Statement 2 : All wild are lions. Conclusion I : All carnivores are lions. Conclusion II : Some lions are carnivores.
2. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : Some clever are intelligent. Statement 2 : No intelligent is Smart. Conclusion I : Some intelligent are clever. Conclusion II : Some smart are clever.
3. Two women A and B are shopping in a mall. They start from the same point. A walks 150 m West, then turns to her left and walks 160 m. B walks 140 m East, then turns South and walks 160 m, then turns to her left and walks 120 m. Where is B with respect to A now?
4. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : All dawn is day. Statement 2 : No day is night. Conclusion I : No night is day. Conclusion II : Some dawn is night.
5. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1 : All flowers are leaves. Statement 2 : Some flowers are plants. Conclusion I : Some leaves are plants. Conclusion II : Some plants are flowers.
6. In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statement to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: (I) Some children are adults. (II) Some adults are old. Conclusion: (I) Some children are not old. (II) Some adults are not old.
7. In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: (I) Men are sinners. (II) Saints are men. Conclusions: (I) Saints are sinners. (II) Sinners are saints.
8. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: No rings are bangles Statement II: All gold are rings Conclusion I: No bangles are gold Conclusion II: Some rings are gold
9. In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: (I) The DRDO has tested the Smart Anti Airfield Weapon from an Indian Air Force aircraft. (II) The lightweight highprecision guided bomb is one of the world class weapons systems. Conclusions: (I) DRDO Chairman Dr. S. Christopher congratulated the DRDO and the IAF teams for the successful mission. (II) The test was carried out by IAF's Aircraft and System Testing Establishment.
10. In the question two statements are given, followed by two conclusions, I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some pizzas are pancakes Statement II: All bread are pizzas Conclusion I: All pancakes are bread Conclusion II: No bread are pizzas