If farmers want to improve their yield, they must use organic fertilizers in place of chemical fertilizers. Assumptions: I. Chemical fertilizers have certain ill effects on health II. Chemical fertilizers do not produce as much yield as the organic fertilizers.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It is a sort of brainwash to make the smokers realize that they are inhaling poisonous stuff.
2. No. It hampers the enjoyment of smoking.

Arguments:

1. Yes. Safety of the country is of prime importance.
2. No. During peace, this money could be used for the development of the country.

Arguments:

1. Yes. The individuals or institutions do not have enough resources to protect them.
2. No. These are the property of the individuals/institutions who win them and should be in their custody.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It will eliminate an important source of corruption.
2. No. It will adversely affect government revenues.

1. Majority of the citizens in the locality belongs to higher income group.
2. The sales in the local super market are comparatively much higher than in other localities.

Arguments:

1. Yes. It will bring efficiency and accuracy in the work.
2. No. It will be an injustice to the monumental human resources which are at present underutilized.
3. No. Computerization demands a lot of money. We should not waste money on it.
4. Yes. When advanced countries are introducing computers in every field, how can India afford to lag behind?

Arguments:

1. No. Ours is a secular state.
2. Yes. Teaching religion helps inculcate moral values among children.
3. No. How can one dream of such a step when we want the young generation to fulfil its role in the 21st century.