This question concerns a committee?s decision about which five of eight areas of expenditure to reduce. The question requires you to suppose that K and N are among the areas that are to be reduced, and then to determine which pair of areas could not also be among the five areas that are reduced.
The fourth condition given in the passage on which this question is based requires that exactly two of K, N, and J are reduced. Since the question asks us to suppose that both K and N are reduced, we know that J must not be reduced:
Reduced :: K, N
Not reduced :: J
The second condition requires that if L is reduced, neither N nor O is reduced. So L and N cannot both be reduced. Here, since N is reduced, we know that L cannot be. Thus, adding this to what we?ve determined so far, we know that J and L are a pair of areas that cannot both be reduced if both K and N are reduced:
Reduced :: K, N
Not reduced :: J, L
Answer choice (B) is therefore the correct answer.
According to above given question figures , we can say that
In each subsequent figure similar design is added.
Hence , figure ( 4 ) will come on the place of ? from answer figures .
Answer A
In the second element the main design has one side more than the main design of the first element.
The second figure is the water image of the first figure.
Find the number of triangles in the figure
We follow the given pattern :-
From the two views of the dice it is clear that dice has been inverted as three dots are on the same side.
Therefore, when two is at the bottom, four will be on the top.
NA
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.