Both I and II follow, because providing nourishment to children needs money. Also, making primary education compulsory is a step forward to tackle the problem of under-nourishment.
Poor maintenance of vehicles may lead to pollution, but is seldom a cause of accident. Hence I does not follows. But II follows as violation of traffic rules is the chief causes of accidents.
According to the statement, the suitable Courses of action is I. People should be encouraged to take fresh fruits and vegetables instead of medicines to meet human body's requirement of vitamins and minerals.
Statement speaks of inadequacies of the education system and emphasizes the need for flexibility and revision. Hence, both the actions are right courses of action to update the curriculum.
Implementation of such action plans as framed by the conference is a right courses of action as it will give an immediate and effective impact on the standard of education for the children.
We should remember that the culprits are mere students. Going for II instead of I would make sense only if it is a repeated act.
I follows, because the patrolling would create a fear among the robbers and act as deterrent. II does not follows because it is not feasible.
Going for I is an extreme action and should be resorted to only when the students fail to behave themselves after repeated warnings like the one given in II.
Both I and II follow. I follows because such an advance notice makes the passengers mentally prepared; II follows as an inevitable courses of action.
Only Courses of action II follow as primary education may eradicate the problem.
Only Course of action I can follow as public awareness programme should be expanded immediately.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.