Both action are strong, according to the statement.
Here, the problem is one of mutual disagreement. So, extreme measures as getting rid of the policy or employees protesting against it, won't help. It can best be solved by finding a middle path via mutual talks. Thus, neither I nor II follows.
Clearly, a suspicion first needs to be confirmed and only when it is confirmed, should an action be taken. So, only course I follows.
Both statements will help in educating people about the value system.
Implementation of such action plans as framed by the conference is an urgent course of action as it will give an immediate and effective impact on the standard of education for the children.
When the Government takes such an action, it is necessary that people are made aware of the consequences they would face, if they don't obey, they lose. Therefore, II follows, I is obvious.
According to the statement , given both the courses of action are strong.
We do not even need to think twice for answering this question as both course of Action I and II are constitutional obligations. Hence, both action follow.
The company must know the reasons why the sale has gone down. Clearly, in this case, price of the product should not be reduced. Hence, only course of Action I will favor the solution.
Both the setups are required.
Both I and II are necessary steps towards prevention of AIDS.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.