Implementation of such action plans as framed by the conference is an urgent course of action as it will give an immediate and effective impact on the standard of education for the children.
When the Government takes such an action, it is necessary that people are made aware of the consequences they would face, if they don't obey, they lose. Therefore, II follows, I is obvious.
As in next century the increased population will have to feed more rice, so it is necessary to allocate funds for rice research. Therefore, I and III follow. All courses of action logically follow. First of all, the water of ponds should be treated to identify the nature of the virus. Since the problem is being faced, so the catching of then shrimps from the ponds should be temporarily stopped. Also, the fisherman should be asked to watch for the onset of such phenomenon in nature.
According to the first course of action, if a students is migrated from a college, the information should be sent to all the other colleges of the university. This is the way by which coordination between universities and colleges can be maintained.
Both statements can help the young pepole to acquire their responsibility.
The best action would be to immediately make necessary arrangement to move the affected pepole safer places.
Both statements will help in educating people about the value system.
Clearly, a suspicion first needs to be confirmed and only when it is confirmed, should an action be taken. So, only course I follows.
Here, the problem is one of mutual disagreement. So, extreme measures as getting rid of the policy or employees protesting against it, won't help. It can best be solved by finding a middle path via mutual talks. Thus, neither I nor II follows.
Both action are strong, according to the statement.
According to the statement , given both the courses of action are strong.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.