Clearly, both the assumptions are implicit in the statement.
I is invalid as there is no indication of an earlier meeting, II is implicit in the call for the meeting.
Employee association urged so because it assumed that members would respond positively. Hence, I is implicit. II is not implicit as it may not be there in the association mind.
Only Assumption I is valid. It is clear that creativity are intelligence are related.
Assumption II is not an assumption at all. It is mere restatement of the given statement.
It is clear that appointment of faculty requires funds, that is why it has been stated that no budgetary provisions will be made. Secondly, budget has been restricted to be invested in other areas. Hence, both the assumptions are implicit.
None of the assumption is implicit in the statement.
Only Assumption I is implicit in the statement. Power and selfishness are root cause of social evils.
Assumption I is implicit as it is this that makes us import sugar in spite of the increase in the number of sugar factories. Assumption II is invalid because "future" is beyond the scope of given statement.
Assumption I is not implicit as it has no connection with the given statement. Infact compensation cannot be solution to terrorist attack. Assumption II is implicit because compensation is a way of sympathising with the victims.
It is a fact that Government's moves are generally aimed at protecting the interests of the masses. Hence, I implicit, II is invalid because "any other way" suggests that there might be other means of gambling which have not been considered detrimental for the people.
Smoking is injurious to health means that non-smoking promotes health and yes, this warning is necessary for various public places, therefore Assumption I is implicit.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.