It is not necessary that every company has a lawyer. So, Assumption I is not implicit. Since it is advice in the statement that for any difficulty about the case, consult company's lawyer, its therefore assumed that company's lawyer is thoroughly briefed about the case. Hence, Assumption II is implicit.
School requires more teachers. it is assumed in the light of statement that teachers are available but it cannot be said that present staff of teachers is not good. hence, only Assumption I is implicit.
Assumption I is implicit as diversion would be necessary while the construction goes on. Assumption II is not implicit as negative reactions are not assumed.
If an instruction is given. it is assumed that it may be followed. Hence, I is invalid. II is also invalid. If at the Government assumes something about the parents, it is to the contrary that the parents may not be able to pay higher fees.
Assumption I is implicit as the municipal corporation takes this action in expectation of large number of devotees. Assumption II is also valid because whenever we plan something, we assume that conditions will be favourable enough.
If someone make a promise, he assumes that the would be able to fulfill it. Hence, Assumption I is valid. Again, since the business ventures are planned to be setup in rural areas, Assumption II must be implicit.
From the word 'quickly' in the statement, it is clearly assumed that normally it will take more time to reach Lucknow from Kanpur. However, it cannot be said whether people will pay extra money for reaching quickly or not.Hence Only Assumption I Implicit the Statement.
Instruction in the statement is based on the assumption that those who lean out of train carry the risk of the being hurt. it is not inferred from the statement that people don't like to get hurt. Hence, Assumption I is implicit.
The word 'natural' has been mentioned in the statement and that part of the statement is 'natural and pure honey' . It does mean that artificial honey can be made. Hence, Assumption I is implicit. Assumption II is not implicit as no comparison is made of the prices of natural and artificial honey. Assumption III is again invalid as it has no relation with the given statement.
Honey produced by company 'X' is being recommended because of it quality, not because of the fact that no other company supplies pure and natural honey. Since advertisement recommends it. hence it is assumed that people read advertisements.
Clearly, the statement is based on the assumption that shortfall in revenue collection leads to an increase in fiscal deficit. Hence, Assumption I is implicit.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.