if neither I nor II is implicit.
Why does the agriculturist focus on 'better understanding ', 'co-operation' and 'complementing' among the exporters? He must be assuming I. Assumption II can't be correlated with the statement. Hence, II is not implicit.
I may or may not be an assumption. But II is obvious. That is why the CM appeals for people's participation.
if neither I nor II is implicit.
Only I is implicit. Why does the company need to issue such instruction? It must be assuming I. The motive behind the instruction may be to ensure convenience in keeping the records regarding transaction of the company. Hence, II is not implicit.
I may or may not be an assumption. But II is obviously implicit. That is why the manufacturers need to oil the wheels that India moves on.
The ground on which the authorities of the bottled water companies ruled out any contamination in their product is its production under rigorous quality control regime. Hence,the companies' authorities must be assuming I. Assumption II is also implicit in the last part of the statement.
I is implicit. Otherwise how can the number of heart patients in all countries of the world be compared to one another? II is not implicit because the statement does not talk about population.
Both I and II are implicit. I is implicit. That is why the speaker points towards the lackadaisical approach of the government in combating AIDS. The word 'sure killer' implies the speaker must be assuming II also.
I is not implicit because 'spate of defeats' can't be correlated with the statement. On a similar basis II also can't be correlated with the statement.
The request of the city police implies that the city police assume that "some people have grievances".Assumption I is not implicit due to the words "All categories" . II is also not implicit because the statement does not say anything about flying squad of vigilance branch.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.