Discussion
Home ‣ Verbal Reasoning ‣ Time Sequence See What Others Are Saying!
- Question
- If two days before yesterday was Friday, what day will be day after tomorrow?
Options- A. Monday
- B. Sunday
- C. Saturday
- D. Wednesday
- Correct Answer
- Wednesday
ExplanationHere , Three days before today was Friday.
? Today is Monday.
Therefore, day after tomorrow will be Wednesday. - 1. Statement
Should government service in rural areas atleast for two years after completion of graduation be made compulsory for the students of medicine.
Arguments
I. Yes, it is everyone's duty to serve the people in rural areas and contribute to their upliftment.
II. No, it cannot be applied only to the medicine students, since anyways they are contributing during their studies and particularly in the period of internship.
Options- A. if only Argument I is strong
- B. if only Argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 2.
38 19 28.5 71.25 18 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Which of the following numbers will come in place of (d)?
Options- A. 118.75
- B. 118.25
- C. 108.25
- D. 118.125 Discuss
- 3. Statement;
Should reputed private driver training schools be allowed to issue driving licences?
Arguments;
I. Yes, This will enable more and more people to get driving licences .
II. No, This will increase the congestion of the vehicles on the road and will result in traffic jams too.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong Discuss
- 4. Statement:
Many organizations have switched over to online mode of examinations.
Assumption:
I. Candidate from all parts of the country may be well-versed using computers.
II. Online mode of examinations helps in recruiting more capable personnel.
Options- A. if only assumption I is implicit.
- B. if only assumption II is implicit.
- C. if either assumption I or II is implicit.
- D. if neither assumption I nor II is implicit. Discuss
- 5. Statement:
All rats are bats.
Some bats are desks.
All desks are chairs.
Conclusions:
I. Some desks are rats.
II. Some chair are rats.
Options- A. if conclusion I follow
- B. if conclusion II follows
- C. if either conclusion I or II follows
- D. if neither conclusion I nor II follows Discuss
- 6. Six friends are sitting in a cricle and playing cards. Kenny is to the left of Danny. Michael is in between Bobby and Johnny. Roger is in between Kenny and Bobby. Who is sitting to the right of Michael?
Options- A. Danny
- B. Johnny
- C. Kenny
- D. Bobby Discuss
- 7. Statement:
Should private Investors be allowed to invest in defence production?
Arguments:
I. Yes. We should stress on quality. If private investors are allowed to invest in defence production, a competition for good quality will arise among them. This will help us to harness our defence sector whit ammunitions of good quality.
II. No. It will be better to keep our defence sector under veil, otherwise it will create threat to the integrity of the nation.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong.
- B. if only argument II is strong.
- C. If either I or II is strong.
- D. If neither I nor II is strong; and Discuss
- 8. Statement:
Should the Government bring the prevention of Terrorism Ordinance (POTO)?
Arguments:
I. No, POTO endangers several constitutionally and internationally accepted human rights standards.
II. Yes, terrorism has become a major threat and existing laws have proved insufficient to combat terrorism.
Options- A. if only argument I is strong
- B. if only argument II is strong
- C. if either I or II is strong
- D. if neither I nor II is strong; and Discuss
- 9. Statement:
Some papers are lamps. Some lamps are bulbs. Some bulbs are tube. Some tubes are walls.
Conclusions:
I. Some walls are lamps.
II. Some bulbs are papers.
III. Some tubes are lamps.
IV. Some walls are papers.
Options- A. Only I and II follow
- B. Only III and IV follow
- C. Only I, III and IV follow
- D. All follow Discuss
- 10. Who is the left of G?
Options- A. A
- B. C
- C. B
- D. None of these Discuss
More questions
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
Argument I is weak because it is not true. You cannot sweep 'everyone' with the same brush. Argument II is ambiguous. it first says, it cannot be applied only to the medicine students.' But remaining part of the argument has got nothing to do with this only.
Correct Answer: 118.125
Explanation:
The given series is in the below pattern ,
First series :-
First term = 38
Second term = First term × 0.5
? Second term = 38 × 0.5 = 19
Third term = Second term × 1.5
? Third term = 19 × 1.5 = 28.5
similarly , we can find the all others terms .
Second series :-
First term = 18
Second term = First term × 0.5
? Second term = 18 × 0.5 = 9
Third term = Second term × 1.5
? Third term = 9 × 1.5 = 13.5
Fourth term = Third term × 2.5
? Fourth term = 13.5 × 2.5 = 33.75
Fifth term = Fourth term × 3.5
? Fifth term = 33.75 × 3.5 = 118.125
So 118.125 should come in place of (d).
Correct Answer: if neither I nor II is strong
Explanation:
I is weak because it is not desirable .Moreover, is falsely assumes that govt authorities can 't cope with the demand of driving hiences . II is weak because it is not logical. it wrongly assumes that such a move will lead to a spurt in the number of vehicles
Correct Answer: if only assumption I is implicit.
Explanation:
Assumption I is implicit because only then the switching over makes sense. But II need not be an assumption. The switching over may have been prompted by economic factors or those of convenience.
Correct Answer: if neither conclusion I nor II follows
Explanation:
All rats are bats + Some bats are desks = I + A = No conclusion Hence I and subsequently II do not follow.
Correct Answer: Bobby
Explanation:
According to question,
Draw a figure , as per the details of sitting arrangement in above question ,
From figure ,it is clear that Bobby is sitting to the right of Michael .
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
I is strong argument. It will definitely help to improve the quality of defence goods, because competition always helps to improve quality at lesser expenses. II is strong because the nation's integrity cannot be compromised.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
Both I and II are strong. Infringement of constitutionally and internationally accepted human rights standards can 't be ignored. Hence I is strong . Argument II is also strong because insufficiency of existing laws gives rise to the need to bring new laws.
Correct Answer:
Explanation:
I-type statements can't be combined.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
Person A is to the left of G.
Comments
There are no comments.More in Verbal Reasoning:
Programming
Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.