Let X be the event that Geeta is present in the photo and event Y that her sister are present. Given that X ? Y.
As per the given information in the photo already has three people (Geeta's parents with their son 3 persons so remaining can be only 2 persons). Thus, Geeta cannot be in the photo.
if we apply the proposed scheme,people will not deposit their money for longer period and thus liquidity with the bank will fall drastically. So, only Argument I holds.
According to given question,
L ? b , X ? a , P ? e , Z ? s , J ? p , Y ? r , Q ? h , M ? i , N ? g , B ? t
Replace the each capital from given relationship for Z B Y X M N Q B , We will get
Z ? s
B ? t
Y ? r
X ? a
M ? i
N ? g
Q ? h
B ? t
Neither Conclusion I nor II follows.
I does not follow because the statement does not say about the reasons behind women's backwardness. Now see the word 'poverty' used in conclusion II. it can't be correlated with the statement. Hence, conclusion II does not follow.
Except 'Sweet', all the others are baked items.
I does not answer how the real prosperity of nation will come thought the move. Hence I is weak. II is also weak because it does not say how the free railway pass will be harmful to students.
As 'Needle' requires 'Thread' for stiching, similarly, 'Pen' requires 'Ink' for writing
I does not tell about the bad aspect of the corporal punishment and why banning is necessary. Hence I is not strong. II is also not strong because the argument is obsessed with an inappropriate assumption that scare of corporal punishment leads a child to studies.
I is not implicit. The assumption is not that fire cannot occur but that it is less likely in Narela or Ghazipur. II is implicit; that is why , of all the items, hazardous chemicals and paper are being moved out.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.