L ? P.....(i) P < V ...(ii) V > D ...(iii)
Combining (i) and (ii)
we get L ? P < V or L < W ...(iv) L and D can't be compared
Hence II does not follows
V ? W ...(i) W = H ...(ii) H ? I ...(iii)
From (i) and (ii) W = H ? I or W ? I ...(iv)
Hence I ? W and II follows But V and I can't be compared From (iii) and (iv)
Hence I does not follows.
N ? W ...(i) W = H ...(ii) H < T ...(iii)
From (i) and (ii) W = N ? W > H or N > H ...(iv)
Hence H < N and I follows.
But T and W can't be compared from (ii) and (iii) Hence II does not follow.
F > R ...(i) H < R ...(ii) L ? H ...(iii)
Combining these we get F > R > H ? L
Hence F > L and I follows
Also R > L and II (R ? L) does not follows.
J ? K ...(i) K < M ...(ii) M > T ...(iii)
K and T can't be compared From (ii) and (iii) but either I (K < T) or II, (K ? T) must be true.
N ? T ... (i) T = H ...(ii) N < w .....(iii)
Combining these we get W > N ? T = H
Hence W > T and I follows.
Also H ? N and II follows
V ? M ...(i) A > M ...(ii) R ? V ...(iii)
These lead us to no relationship by combination.
D > K ...(i) K ? R ...(ii) R = M ...(iii)
From (ii) and (iii) M ? K ...(iv)
Hence either I (M = K) or III (M > K) follow. But M and T can't be compared from (i) and (iv).
Hence II does not follow.
B = D ...(i) D ? H ...(ii) H > F ...(iii)
D and F can't be compared from (i) and (ii). And from the same reason, if we bear (i) an mind. B and F can't be compared. Hence none follows.
J ? N ...(i) K ? N ...(ii) T > K ...(iii)
Combining these we get T > K ? N ? J
Hence J < T and I follows. Also T > N and II follows.
Beside N ? J and III follows
M < R ...(i) R ? T ...(ii) T = N ...(iii)
Combining these we get M < R ? T = N
Hence N ? R
Which means either I (N = R) or II (N > R) follows.
Again N > M. Hence III follows
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.