Let the 7 consecutive whole numbers be (n ± 3), (n ± 2), (n ± 1), n.
Now i we consider Statement I alone
Product of these 7 integers = 702800
Since 702800 = 24 52 (251)(7), it cannot be the product of 7 consecutive whole numbers. Hence I alone is insufficient.
Now if we consider Statement II alone
Given that their sum = 105 = 7n or n = 15 and then 7 consecutive integers are 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 So, II alone is sufficient.
From I : M (+) - P - T ( - )
Combining, we get M ( + ) - P - T ( - )
But II also say's J's husband has one son and two daughters.
Hence, P must be daughter of J.
From above given data , we have
The total number of employees in the organisation = 520
Ratio of men to women in the organisation = 5 : 3
Number of men in the organisation = 5 x 65 = 325
Number of women in the organisation = 3 x 65 = 195
Number of men working in the HR department = 325 of 4% = 13
Number of women working in the HR department = 195 of 40% = 78
? Required ratio = Number of men working in the HR department : Number of women working in the HR department
= 13 : 78 = 1 : 6
From above given table , we have
Total population in 1988 = 146947
Total number of men = 65104
Total number of women = 60387
The number of children in 1988 = Total population in 1988 ? ( Total number of men in 1988 + Total number of women in 1988 )
= 146947 ? (65104 + 60387) = 21456.
According to the table in the research and development department number of employees remained nearly same during the year from 2003 to 2008.
As per given pie-chart , we can see that
The land used for rice is represented by 72°
The land used for barley is represented by 36°
? Required ratio = rice crops : barley crops
Required ratio = 72° : 36° = 2 : 1
As per given graph, we can see that,
Sales in 2002 = 2 billion dollar
Sales in 2007 = 6 billion dollar
? Required ratio = sales in 2002 : sales in 2007
Required ratio = 2 : 6 = 1 : 3
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.