From I: The possible day of exam is Wednesday.
From II. The third day of the week is Wednesday.
Hence, either statement I alone or statement II alone is sufficient.
From I: Possible months: January, February, March, April, May or June.
From II: Rahul's son correctly remembers that his father went on vacation after 31st March but before 1st May. So, his father went on vacation in the month of April. Hence only II is sufficient.
From I: P > Q, but T is not the tallest.
From II: R > P, but S is not the tallest.
From I and II: R > P > Q. Neither S nor T can be the tallest. Hence R is the tallest.
From I: EAST or ETSA
Hence I alone is not sufficient
From II: Only EAST is possible
Hence II alone is sufficient.
Even by using both the statements, we are not able to detemine who is tallest as we do not have the exact idea about the height of Q.
Using Statement I:
Using Statement II:
So, by Using Statement I alone, we can say that E sits on the immediate right of A.
from I: Two-digit marks is less than or equal to 20.
Possible marks: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20
From II: Suman scored more than 9 marks.
Possible marks: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20
Hence statement I and II together are not sufficient.
It is given that Ram got a dividend of ? 1500.
Statement I
Knowing the dividend paid last year, we cannot find the dividend paid this year.
Statement II
Given that Ram bought 350 shares of face value ? 10, and so, their total face value is ?3500. So, here we know the investment and the return hence wen can find out the rate of interest.
Statement I is not sufficient as the size of the ice cube and height of the container is not known hence statement I is not sufficient alone.
Statement I is not sufficient as the dimension of the container is not known.
We cannot answer the question even by combining both the statement as the height of the container is not known.
Since sum is 360 hence P + Q + R + S = 360
From statement I alone we will get P = (Q + R + S)/3 from this we can find the value of P hence statement I alone is sufficient enough.
From statement II alone we can not find the value of P.
Let the 7 consecutive whole numbers be (n ± 3), (n ± 2), (n ± 1), n.
Now i we consider Statement I alone
Product of these 7 integers = 702800
Since 702800 = 24 52 (251)(7), it cannot be the product of 7 consecutive whole numbers. Hence I alone is insufficient.
Now if we consider Statement II alone
Given that their sum = 105 = 7n or n = 15 and then 7 consecutive integers are 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 So, II alone is sufficient.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.