From I: P > O > N
From II: L > M From I and II, either M or N is the shortest. We can't determine who is shorter between the two of them.
Data in both statements I and II together are not sufficient to answer the question. Hence, required answer is option D .
From Statement I.
Let the ratio proportion is x.
some of angle of triangle = 180 °
3x + 5x + 4x = 180 °
12x = 180 °
x = 180 ° /12
x = 15 °
Largest angle of triangle
= 5x = 5 x 15
= 75 °
? Larger angle of parallelogram
= 75 ° + 34 °
= 109 °
? Smaller angle of parallelogram
= 180 ° - 109 °
= 71 °
From Statement II,
Let the smaller angle of parallelogram be = x
and the larger angle of parallelogram = x + 38 °
Sum of two opposite angles of a parallelogram = 180 °
x + x + 38 ° = 180 °
? 2x = 180 ° - 38°
? 2x = 142°
? x = 142° / 2
? x = 71 °
From Statement I,
Area of square = 576 sq cm
? Side of square = Square root of Square's area
? Side of square = Square root of 576 = 24 cm
and area of rectangle = 600 sq cm
area of rectangle = ( length x breadth ) of rectangle
We cannot find the length of rectangle
From Statement II,
Breadth of rectangle = side of square x 1/2
Breadth of rectangle = 24 x 1/2 = 12 cm
? Length of rectangle = 600/12 = 50 cm
? Ratio = Length of rectangle/ Side of square = 50/24
= 25/12
From Statement I , given that
4p + 3q + 5r = 60...............(i)
2p = q
? p = q/2 ................(ii)
and 2q = r ....................(iii)
putting the value of p and r in terms of q in Eq. (i),
4 x q/2 + 3q + 5 x 2q = 60
15q = 60
? q = 4
put the value of q in Eq. (ii)
? p = q/2 = 4/2
p = 2;
put the value of q in Eq. (iii)
? r = 2q = 2 x 4
? r = 8
? value of p2 + q + r = (2)2 + 4 + 8 = 16
From Statement II,
3x + 3y + 2z = 34 ..............(a)
and 2x + 5y + 6z = 72 ....(b)
We cannot find the value of p, q and r from Eqs. (a) and (b)
From Statement I,
Raveena is half as old as Karishma. But we don't know the age of Karishma.
From Statement II,
Age of Raveena = three-fifth of her mother's age
Age of Raveena = Age of her Mother x 3/5
Age of Raveena = 45 x 3/5 = 27 yr
From I: If all of them face the centre, it means if A sits second to the left of B, then B should sit second to the right of A. But here Amit and Arun are different persons. Hence all of them do not face the centre
From II: Again suppose of them face the centre like KEN. Ali sits third to the left of ken. Now, if Amit sits on the left of Ali obviously ken should be his neighbour. But the statement says otherwise. Hence our assumption is disproved. All of them do not face the centre.
In I, Sex of T is not known. In II, Q does not figure. Hence we need both the statements to establish the relationship.
From I: We don't known whether B is to the west or east of C. In fact, it could be in any other direction.
From II: Obviously A is west of B.
From I: Bharat has two siblings but we don't know their sex.
Using Statement I:
a letter ? '71'
Using Statement II:
'in' ? '4'
Using both:
'Greek' ? '5' and 'received ? '3'
Code for 'letter' cannot be found even by using both statements together.
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.