Check given option one by one.
Option (A),
Percentage increase in production in 1991 = {(Production in 1991 - Production in 1990)} x 100 % / Production in 1990
Percentage increase in production in 1991 = {( 60 - 40 )} x 100 % / 40
Percentage increase in production in 1991 = 20 x 100 % / 40
Percentage increase in production in 1991 = 100 % / 2 = 50 %
Option (B)
Percentage increase in production in 1993 = {( Production in 1993 - Production in 1992 )} x 100 % / Production in 1992
Percentage increase in production in 1993 = {( 65 - 45 )} x 100 % / 45
Percentage increase in production in 1993 = 20 x 100 % / 45
Percentage increase in production in 1993 = 4 x 100 % / 9 = 400/9 = 44.44 %
Option (C)
Percentage increase in production in 1995 = {( Production in 1995 - Production in 1994 )} x 100 % / Production in 1994
Percentage increase in production in 1995 = {( 75 - 50 )} x 100 % / 50
Percentage increase in production in 1995 = 25 x 100 % / 50
Percentage increase in production in 1995 = 100 % / 2 =50 %
Option (D)
Percentage increase in production in 1990 = {( Production in 1990 - Production in 1989 )} x 100 % / Production in 1989
Percentage increase in production in 1990 = {( 40 - 25)} x 100 % / 25
Percentage increase in production in 1990 = 15 x 100 % / 25
Percentage increase in production in 1990 = 15 x 4 % = 60 %
Central angle of 18° = | ❨ | 18 | x 100 | ❩ | % of the total expenditure |
360 |
= 5% of the total expenditure.
From the given chart it is clear that:
Out of the given combinations, only in combination (d) the difference is 5% i.e.
Paper Cost - Printing Cost | = (25% - 20%) of the total expenditure |
= 5% of the total expenditure. |
For 1997 | ❨ | 780 | x 100 | ❩ | % = 12.19%. |
6400 |
For 1998 | ❨ | 1020 | x 100 | ❩ | % = 11.59%. |
8800 |
For 1999 | ❨ | 890 | x 100 | ❩ | % = 11.41%. |
7800 |
For 2000 | ❨ | 1010 | x 100 | ❩ | % = 11.54%. |
8750 |
For 2001 | ❨ | 1250 | x 100 | ❩ | % = 12.82%. |
9750 |
∴ Maximum percentage is for the year 2001.
Profit per cent during the year 2005 as compared to the previous year =(95 - 45) x 100/4.5 = 111.11%
Hence, profit in the year 2005 was more than 100% as compared to the previous year.
Total number of students for Cricket = Number of students play cricket from schools ( A + B + C + D + E )
Total number of students for Cricket = 150 + 200 + 250 + 230 + 200
Total number of students for Cricket = 1030
Let us assume E was the expenditure in 1997.
As we can see in the given graph that,
Income in 1997 = 190
Profit = 25 % (Given in the question.)
Then according to question,
E + E x 25 % = 190
E + E x 25 /100 = 190
(100E + E x 25 ) /100 = 190
125E / 100 = 160
125E = 190 x 100
E = 190 x 100 / 125 = 190 x 4 / 5 = 38 x 4
E = 152
Expenditure in 1997 E = 152 Million
We do not need to calculate the values for each year.
Follow as:
For Rural area : 35% of 5032 ? 35 × 50 = 1750 ? 1798
For Semi-urban area : 35% of 9500 ? 35 × 95 ? 3300
Which cannot be approximated to 3500.
For State capitals : 35 × 85 = 3000
For Metropolises : 35 × 110 = 3850
Comments
There are no comments.Copyright ©CuriousTab. All rights reserved.