Question 1

Since microprocessor CPUs cannot execute human-readable mnemonics directly, into what form must these assembly mnemonics be translated before execution?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Processors read and execute sequences of bits, not textual mnemonics. Assemblers and toolchains therefore convert symbolic instructions into the exact binary encodings defined by the instruction set architecture (ISA). Given Data / Assumptions: Assembler input: MOV A,B or similar mnemonics. CPU input requirement: binary op-codes and operands. Hexadecimal is a human-friendly representation of binary, not a separate executable form. Concept / Approach: The ISA specifies bit fields for operation, addressing mode, and operands. The assembler encodes these into binary. Hex is often used as a compact notation for binary but the hardware ultimately consumes binary voltage levels. Step-by-Step Solution: Write assembly source with mnemonics.Run assembler → produce object code (binary) and optionally hex listings.Loader places binary into memory for execution.CPU fetches and interprets binary op-codes. Verification / Alternative check: Disassemblers convert binary back to mnemonics; this reversibility demonstrates the binary-to-text mapping. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Hex is just a numbering system for displaying binary; the CPU still operates on binary. C: Assembly language is the mnemonic source, not the executable form. D: Not all choices are correct; only binary is fundamental to execution. Common Pitfalls: Confusing “hex file” formats (e.g., Intel HEX) with the actual in-memory binary bytes; hex files are transport representations. Final Answer: binary machine code

Question 2

Clarify terminology: what is the essential difference between mnemonic code (assembly language) and machine code in microprocessor programming?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Understanding the distinction between human-readable assembly and processor-readable machine code is foundational for embedded and systems programming. Assemblers bridge these two representations. Given Data / Assumptions: Mnemonic code uses alphabetic tokens (e.g., MOV, ADD, JMP). Machine code consists of binary patterns (often shown in hex). Both encode the same operations but in different forms for different audiences (humans vs. hardware). Concept / Approach: Machine code is the literal bit pattern that the CPU decodes and executes. Mnemonics are symbolic names for these operations, improving readability and maintainability. Labels and directives further assist organization in mnemonic form. Step-by-Step Solution: Consider instruction MOV A,B (mnemonic, readable).Assembler maps it to a specific binary op-code (e.g., a byte value).CPU fetches and executes the binary instruction from memory.Therefore, the difference lies in representation: text vs. bits. Verification / Alternative check: Use an assembler and a disassembler: one direction turns mnemonics into binary; the other reverses the process, confirming equivalence of meaning but difference of form. Why Other Options Are Wrong: A: Incorrect; they are different representations. C: Reverses the correct mapping. Common Pitfalls: Believing that hex listings are different from machine code; they are just a readable numeral system for binary bytes. Final Answer: Machine codes are in binary, mnemonic codes are in shorthand English.

Question 3

In a microprocessor-based system, which bus primarily carries the control signals that direct peripherals and memory to perform specific operations (read, write, acknowledge, interrupt, etc.)?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: System buses partition the roles of communication between the CPU, memory, and peripherals. Differentiating the data, address, and control buses is a core concept in digital system design and troubleshooting. Given Data / Assumptions: Address bus: selects which memory or I/O location is targeted. Data bus: carries the actual data values being read or written. Control bus: carries signals defining the operation and timing. Concept / Approach: To perform any transaction, the CPU places an address on the address bus, the operation type on the control bus (e.g., RD, WR), and transfers data on the data bus. Additional control lines can include clock, reset, interrupt requests, and acknowledge signals. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the bus that encodes operation intent → control bus.Recognize that data values traverse the data bus, not control.Understand that the address bus selects targets, not operations.Therefore, the bus that directs ICs about the operation is the control bus. Verification / Alternative check: Examine timing diagrams of a memory read cycle: signals like RD, WR, ALE, and IO/M are asserted on control lines to define the transaction. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Data bus: carries payload, not directives. Address bus: carries location indices, not read/write control. Address decoder bus: not a standard bus name; decoding happens on address lines using logic. Common Pitfalls: Assuming any single bus controls everything; in reality, the three-bus model separates roles for clarity and performance. Final Answer: control bus

Question 4

Microprocessor buses — standard widths In classic microprocessor architecture fundamentals, how many bits are commonly used on the data bus to transfer data between the CPU, memory, and I/O devices?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The data bus is the set of parallel conductors that carries actual data values between the central processing unit, memory, and input/output peripherals. Understanding its typical width helps learners connect processor families (8-bit, 16-bit, 32-bit) to performance and design trade-offs. Given Data / Assumptions: The question refers to foundational microprocessor systems commonly taught at the introductory level. Many classic CPUs and peripheral chips exchange data over an 8-bit data bus. Higher-width buses do exist (16, 32, 64), but are not the default in entry-level discussions. Concept / Approach: Historically, mainstream introductory microprocessors (and their memory/I-O ecosystems) used 8-bit data buses. An 8-bit bus moves one byte per transfer, which aligns with byte-addressable memory and keeps board complexity low for teaching and simpler embedded designs. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify “typical/commonly used” width in early and educational systems → 8 bits.Relate to byte-sized data transfers → 1 transfer = 1 byte.Confirm alternatives → 7 and 9 bits are nonstandard; 16 bits belong to wider, costlier designs. Verification / Alternative check: Survey of classic microcontrollers and early CPUs (e.g., foundational teaching platforms) shows widespread use of 8-bit data buses, with memory chips and peripherals designed around byte-wide interfaces. Why Other Options Are Wrong: 7 or 9: uncommon widths for general data buses. 16: valid for 16-bit families, but not the most common foundational width. Common Pitfalls: Equating address-bus width with data-bus width; these are independent. Also assuming “wider is always better,” ignoring cost and complexity. Final Answer: 8

Question 5

Control bus sharing — true or false? In a typical microprocessor system, do the control bus and memory devices share a single bidirectional bus line in the same way as the data bus?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: A microprocessor system uses three conceptual buses: address, data, and control. While the data bus is bidirectional, the control bus carries timing and control signals with fixed directions (from CPU to devices or vice versa). Clarifying this prevents wiring and design misunderstandings. Given Data / Assumptions: “Typical” microprocessor system organization is assumed. Control bus includes dedicated signals such as read, write, memory/IO select, interrupt lines, and acknowledge lines. Data bus is bidirectional; address bus is usually unidirectional from CPU to memory/I-O. Concept / Approach: The term “bus” implies shared conductors, but not every signal shares a single bidirectional line. Control signals are distinct lines with defined directions; they are not a single bidirectional conductor shared like the data bus. Therefore the statement that control bus and memories “share a bidirectional bus” is inaccurate. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify bus roles → address (uni), data (bi), control (mixed fixed-direction lines).Check claim → “control bus and memories share a bidirectional bus” → incorrect generalization.Conclude → The statement is false. Verification / Alternative check: Block diagrams in textbooks show separate labeled control lines rather than a single bidirectional “control/data” line shared with memory. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “True” would imply control behaves like data lines, which is not the case. Common Pitfalls: Assuming that because signals share a connector or backplane they are bidirectional; directionality is defined per signal. Final Answer: False

Question 6

Minimal microprocessor system design: A basic microprocessor with necessary support circuits will include at least two memory ICs: nonvolatile program memory (ROM/EPROM) and volatile data memory (RAM). Evaluate this statement.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Early and many classic microprocessor systems rely on external memory ICs. Program code must live somewhere nonvolatile, and temporary data, stacks, and variables require RAM. This question asks if at least ROM/EPROM and RAM are needed in a minimal, practical design. Given Data / Assumptions: We are considering general-purpose microprocessors (not self-contained microcontrollers). Program code must persist across power cycles (ROM/EPROM/Flash). Runtime data storage (stack, variables, buffers) needs RAM. Concept / Approach: A microprocessor typically lacks on-chip program and data memory (unlike many microcontrollers). The standard approach is to connect external nonvolatile memory for code and RAM for read/write storage. Even simple monitor programs and I/O routines require this split unless you boot from an on-chip ROM (which microprocessors generally do not provide). Step-by-Step Solution: Define the roles: nonvolatile for code, volatile for data/stack.Identify external memory buses in common microprocessors (address, data, control).Recognize that typical boot requires code fetch from ROM/EPROM/Flash.Conclude that at least one ROM/EPROM and one RAM device are required in a basic system. Verification / Alternative check: Reference evaluation boards for 8085/8086/6800-class devices: they include separate ROM and RAM ICs. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect: Would ignore the need for persistent code storage or working RAM.Applies only to Harvard-architecture CPUs: The need arises from external memory absence, not the Harvard/Von Neumann split.Valid only when interrupts are disabled: Interrupts are unrelated to basic memory requirements. Common Pitfalls: Confusing microprocessors with microcontrollers; the latter often integrate Flash and RAM on-chip.Assuming ROMless boot with serial loaders; you still need RAM to execute and code storage somewhere persistent. Final Answer: Correct

Question 7

Assembly vs. high-level language clarification: The mnemonics “LDA addr” and “STA addr” are Fortran language instructions stored in an external memory IC for a microprocessor. Evaluate this statement.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Microprocessor instruction sets are executed via machine code, with human-readable mnemonics provided by assembly language. High-level languages such as Fortran are compiled into machine code; they do not use processor-specific mnemonics like “LDA” or “STA” in source form. Given Data / Assumptions: LDA addr typically means “load accumulator from memory address.” STA addr typically means “store accumulator to memory address.” These mnemonics are traditional for 8-bit families (e.g., 8085, 6502) and others. Concept / Approach: Fortran uses English-like mathematical statements, not CPU-specific opcodes. Assemblers translate mnemonics such as LDA/STA into machine opcodes. Therefore, labeling LDA/STA as Fortran is incorrect; they are assembly instructions. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify LDA/STA as assembly mnemonics.Note that Fortran source uses higher-level constructs (e.g., variable assignments, DO loops) without exposing CPU mnemonics.Assemblers convert mnemonics to machine code; compilers convert Fortran to machine code.Thus, the statement is incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Check any assembly reference manual; LDA/STA entries appear under the processor’s ISA, not in a Fortran manual. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Correct: Would wrongly assert LDA/STA belong to Fortran.Valid only for 16-bit processors / Applies to macro assemblers only: Irrelevant; the mnemonics are assembly regardless of data width or macro usage. Common Pitfalls: Confusing embedded assembly listings within high-level projects with the high-level language itself.Assuming any mnemonic-like token is a high-level language statement. Final Answer: Incorrect

Question 8

Assembler workflow fundamentals: Converting assembly language to machine language can be performed manually by the programmer via a process commonly called “hand assembly.” Evaluate this statement.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Assembly language is a human-readable representation of machine instructions. Historically, programmers sometimes converted these mnemonics to opcodes and addresses manually—a practice known as “hand assembly.” This still helps in understanding instruction encoding and debugging at the lowest level. Given Data / Assumptions: An instruction set architecture (ISA) defines opcodes and formats. Assemblers automate translation but are not strictly required. Manual encoding is feasible for small programs or educational purposes. Concept / Approach: Hand assembly involves looking up opcodes, addressing modes, and operand encodings in the ISA manual, then writing the corresponding machine bytes. The process is architecture-agnostic; it applies to CISC, RISC, 8-bit, 16-bit, or 32-bit ISAs, though it becomes tedious for large programs. Step-by-Step Solution: Write the assembly source with labels and mnemonics.Resolve labels to addresses and compute displacements.Use the ISA reference to map each mnemonic and addressing mode to opcode bytes.Generate the machine code listing for use in ROM/RAM or for programming devices. Verification / Alternative check: Compare hand-assembled bytes to the output of an assembler for the same source to confirm correctness. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect: Assemblers are common, but they do not preclude manual translation.Valid only for RISC / Applies only to 8-bit MCUs: Hand assembly is independent of ISA type or word size. Common Pitfalls: Miscalculating branch offsets or immediate values.Forgetting endianness when writing multibyte operands. Final Answer: Correct

Question 9

I/O-mapped addressing basics: In an I/O-mapped system, input and output devices are identified by assigning them an 8-bit port number. Evaluate this statement in the context of classic 8-bit microprocessors.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: There are two common approaches to peripheral addressing: memory-mapped I/O and I/O-mapped (isolated) I/O. Classic 8-bit CPUs (for example, the 8085) often use I/O-mapped addressing with dedicated instructions and a limited port address space. Given Data / Assumptions: We focus on classic 8-bit designs where I/O-mapped I/O is common. Port numbers are often 8 bits wide (256 ports) on these CPUs. Other architectures (e.g., 8086/80286) may extend port addressing to 16 bits. Concept / Approach: In I/O-mapped I/O, special instructions (such as IN/OUT) address peripherals using a port number separate from the memory address space. On many 8-bit processors, this port number is 8 bits, providing 0–255 unique ports. This is distinct from memory-mapped I/O, which uses normal memory addresses and loads/stores. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the addressing mode: I/O-mapped versus memory-mapped.Note that classic 8-bit CPUs commonly implement 8-bit port addressing.Acknowledge that later x86 variants support 16-bit I/O address space, but the statement remains correct within the classic 8-bit context.Therefore, the statement is correct for the assumed context. Verification / Alternative check: Review the 8085 instruction set (IN, OUT) and its 8-bit port addressing model as a representative case. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect: Would deny widely used 8-bit I/O-mapped implementations.Valid only for memory-mapped I/O: Port numbers do not apply to memory-mapped addressing.Applies exclusively to 32-bit processors: I/O-mapped I/O is not tied to 32-bit architectures. Common Pitfalls: Generalizing all systems; many modern MCUs use memory-mapped I/O instead.Confusing I/O-mapped port numbers with memory addresses. Final Answer: Correct

Question 10

Terminology accuracy: The software used to drive, control, and initialize a microprocessor-based system is called FORTRAN. Evaluate this statement.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The software that operates a microprocessor system—boot code, drivers, low-level routines, control logic—is commonly called firmware or system software when stored in nonvolatile memory. FORTRAN, by contrast, is a high-level programming language, not the generic term for control software. Given Data / Assumptions: Microprocessor-based systems need initialization and control code. That code may be in ROM/Flash and is often termed firmware. High-level languages (C, C++, Fortran, etc.) can be compiled to machine code used by such systems. Concept / Approach: The term FORTRAN refers to a specific language created for numerical computing. While one could write control software in Fortran and compile it, the general term for the software itself is not “Fortran”; it is software/firmware. Therefore, the statement is incorrect on terminology grounds. Step-by-Step Solution: Define “firmware”: software stored in nonvolatile memory to control hardware.Identify that FORTRAN is a language, not a classification of control software.Conclude the statement conflates the language with the role of the code.Hence, it is incorrect. Verification / Alternative check: Industry documentation and datasheets refer to bootloaders, monitors, BIOS, and drivers as firmware/system software, not “Fortran.” Why Other Options Are Wrong: Correct / True variants: Misuse the term; the role is firmware/software irrespective of language.Valid only when using PDP-class systems / True if the compiler outputs assembly: Historical platforms do not change the naming convention. Common Pitfalls: Assuming the language name is the same as the artifact’s role.Ignoring that firmware can be built from multiple languages or even pure assembly. Final Answer: Incorrect

Question 11

Microprocessor memory usage: The stack is a data storage area located in RAM and used by certain microprocessor operations such as subroutine calls, returns, and saving registers. Evaluate this statement.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The stack is a fundamental abstraction used by microprocessors to manage temporary data, call/return sequences, interrupt contexts, and local storage. Understanding its location and purpose is essential for low-level programming and system design. Given Data / Assumptions: The stack typically resides in RAM for read/write access. It operates in last-in, first-out (LIFO) fashion. Instructions such as CALL/RET and PUSH/POP manipulate the stack. Concept / Approach: Because subroutines and interrupts must save return addresses and registers, a writable memory region is required. RAM is used for this purpose. The CPU maintains a stack pointer (SP) that tracks the top of the stack. On function calls or interrupts, the CPU pushes data; on return, it pops data, restoring prior context. Step-by-Step Solution: Initialize stack pointer to a valid RAM region.On CALL/interrupt, push return address and sometimes registers.Execute routine; use PUSH/POP to manage local temporaries if needed.On RET/IRET, pop to restore state and continue execution. Verification / Alternative check: Examine any CPU programmer’s manual; stack operations reference RAM addresses via SP/FP registers. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect: Would deny the widely implemented RAM-based stack model.True only for Harvard architectures: Stack usage is architecture-agnostic; both Harvard and Von Neumann designs use RAM for stacks.Applies only when interrupts are disabled: Interrupt handling explicitly uses the stack to save context. Common Pitfalls: Placing the stack in insufficient RAM space causing overflows into other data.Neglecting interrupt nesting depth when budgeting stack size. Final Answer: Correct

Question 12

Microcontroller definition and integration: A microcontroller places on a single chip what previously required multiple chips—namely, a CPU core together with on-chip RAM, on-chip ROM/flash, and general-purpose I/O peripherals for embedded control.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Microcontrollers are the workhorses of embedded systems. Unlike general-purpose microprocessors that typically require external memory and peripheral chips, microcontrollers integrate core resources on a single die to reduce cost, power, and board space. This question checks whether you recognize that an MCU consolidates CPU, RAM, ROM/flash, and I/O into one device to replace multichip solutions. Given Data / Assumptions: The device under discussion is a microcontroller (MCU), not a general microprocessor (MPU). Typical MCU resources include CPU core, RAM, nonvolatile program memory (ROM/flash), and programmable I/O peripherals (timers, GPIO, serial ports). External expansion may still be possible but is not required for basic operation. Concept / Approach: The hallmark of an MCU is integration. By co-locating memory and I/O with the CPU, the device can start executing from on-chip nonvolatile memory after reset and interact with the outside world via on-chip peripherals. This simplifies design compared with an MPU that commonly boots from external ROM and uses external RAM and discrete I/O controllers. Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the key MCU subsystems: CPU + RAM + ROM/flash + I/O.Recognize that “integrates multichip systems” means replacing separate memory and I/O chips once needed with a single package.Conclude that the statement accurately describes an MCU’s purpose. Verification / Alternative check: Examine block diagrams of common MCUs (e.g., 8051, AVR, PIC, ARM Cortex-M). Each shows on-chip memories and I/O. Development boards run code from internal flash and use internal SRAM without external devices, confirming the statement. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect: Contradicts standard MCU architecture. Only true for 32-bit devices: 8-bit and 16-bit MCUs have integrated RAM/ROM/I/O, too. Only true when external buses are disabled: External buses are optional; integration does not depend on disabling them. True only for SoCs, not MCUs: MCUs are a class of SoC focused on control tasks. Common Pitfalls: Confusing MCUs with MPUs; assuming all processors need external memory; overlooking that some MCUs optionally add external memory for larger applications but still integrate core resources. Final Answer: Correct

Question 13

8080A vs. 8085A software compatibility: Do programs written for the Intel 8080A require modifications to run on the Intel 8085A microprocessor?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: The Intel 8085A was designed as an upward-compatible successor to the 8080A. Understanding what “software compatible” means in historical microprocessor families helps developers port legacy code and reuse existing tools. This question tests whether you know that 8080A binaries generally execute on the 8085A as-is. Given Data / Assumptions: Source/binary originally targets 8080A. Target CPU is 8085A, which includes a superset of 8080A instructions. No reliance on undocumented opcodes or exotic hardware dependencies. Concept / Approach: Upward (backward) compatibility means a newer CPU executes code for an older CPU without modification. The 8085A kept the 8080A instruction set and flags while adding new instructions and on-chip features (e.g., serial I/O signals, single 5 V supply). Therefore, standard 8080A programs—both source and binaries—run on the 8085A unchanged. Step-by-Step Solution: Compare instruction sets: 8085A ⊇ 8080A.Confirm flag behavior and addressing modes are preserved for 8080A instructions.Conclude that modifications are not required for normal 8080A programs. Verification / Alternative check: Cross-assemblers can generate identical machine code for both targets when restricted to 8080A mnemonics. Historical documentation and application notes state that 8080A object code will execute on the 8085A. Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Correct statement: changes required” is false for standard code. “Only I/O routines must be rewritten”: Not required unless you exploit 8085-specific peripherals. “Only arithmetic routines need patching”: The arithmetic/flag model is compatible for 8080A instructions. “Compatibility only in monitor ROMs”: Compatibility applies broadly, not just to monitors. Common Pitfalls: Confusing hardware pin differences with ISA compatibility; using 8085-only mnemonics and then expecting the same code to run on 8080A (that breaks reverse compatibility, not forward). Final Answer: Incorrect statement: 8080A programs run on 8085A without changes

Question 14

8085 and 8080A compatibility: Is 8085 software (restricted to the common instruction set) compatible with the Intel 8080A architecture?

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Compatibility between processors affects portability of both source and binary code. The Intel 8085 maintained the 8080A instruction set, adding new instructions and features. This question checks whether you understand that, if you stick to the common subset, the software executes across both CPUs. Given Data / Assumptions: 8085 includes all 8080A instructions and flags. 8085 adds extra instructions; these are not available on 8080A. We are discussing compatibility at the instruction-set level, not pinouts. Concept / Approach: If an 8085 program uses only the instructions available on 8080A, its machine code is indistinguishable from equivalent 8080A code and therefore runs on an 8080A. Problems arise only if the 8085-specific opcodes are used (those have no counterpart on 8080A). This is the standard notion of writing to the “lowest common denominator.” Step-by-Step Solution: Identify the ISA intersection: the full 8080A set.Ensure the program uses only those mnemonics/opcodes.Assemble to object code and run on 8080A successfully. Verification / Alternative check: Assemble the same source with an 8080A assembler: if it compiles, the resulting binary will execute equivalently on either CPU (barring timing- or hardware-specific assumptions). Why Other Options Are Wrong: “Incompatible” is too strong and contradicts the shared ISA. “Arithmetic only” or “branching excluded” arbitrarily restricts features incorrectly. “Requires a hardware adapter” confuses electrical with software compatibility. Common Pitfalls: Using 8085-only instructions (e.g., SIM/RIM usage differences) and expecting execution on 8080A; overlooking that device-specific I/O mappings still matter for peripherals even when code is ISA-compatible. Final Answer: Compatible: 8085 code using only 8080A instructions runs on 8080A

Question 15

Assembly language mnemonics (8080/8085 examples): Assembly is written with human-readable mnemonics such as MVI, DCR, and JZ that an assembler translates into machine code.

Accepted Answer

Introduction / Context: Assembly language bridges human readability and machine execution. Instead of numeric opcodes, programmers use mnemonic abbreviations that are easy to remember and correspond to specific machine instructions. Classic 8-bit processors like the Intel 8080/8085 popularized mnemonics such as MVI (move immediate), DCR (decrement), and JZ (jump if zero). Given Data / Assumptions: An assembler is available to convert mnemonics to opcodes. Examples MVI, DCR, JZ are recognized mnemonics on 8080/8085. Target output is machine code (binary object) executable by the CPU. Concept / Approach: Assembly mnemonics map one-to-one (or via defined encodings) to instructions. The assembler resolves symbols, encodes opcodes and operands, manages addresses/labels, and emits binary suitable for PROM/flash or loaders. This is universal across architectures, whether CISC or RISC, 8-bit or 64-bit, though exact mnemonics vary by ISA. Step-by-Step Solution: Write source using mnemonics (e.g., MVI A, 3AH; DCR B; JZ LOOP).Run assembler → translate to opcodes + immediate/data bytes.Load the binary into memory; CPU executes the encoded instructions. Verification / Alternative check: Comparing assembler listings shows each mnemonic and its hex opcode bytes. Emulators or debuggers can disassemble the binary back to mnemonics, confirming the mapping. Why Other Options Are Wrong: Incorrect: Assemblers do this by definition. Only true for RISC or macro assemblers: Both CISC and RISC use mnemonics; macros are optional and orthogonal. Valid only for 32-bit code: Works for all word sizes. Common Pitfalls: Assuming mnemonics are portable across ISAs; confusing assembler directives (e.g., ORG, DB) with executable instructions; forgetting that different assemblers may use slightly different syntax conventions. Final Answer: Correct

Microprocessor Fundamentals Questions