Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: A linked list uses dynamically allocated nodes linked by pointers, while an array uses contiguous memory with fixed size indexing
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Arrays and linked lists are fundamental linear data structures taught in introductory computer science courses. They both store collections of elements, but their internal organisation and performance characteristics differ significantly. Understanding these differences is critical for choosing the right structure in algorithms and for answering data structure interview questions. This question asks for a conceptual comparison of linked lists and arrays in terms of memory layout and typical operations.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
In an array, the index of an element can be used with a simple arithmetic calculation to compute its memory address, which makes random access operations very fast. However, the array size is usually fixed, and inserting or deleting elements in the middle requires shifting subsequent elements. In a linked list, each node is allocated separately, and nodes are connected through pointers. This allows easy insertion and deletion by adjusting pointers, without shifting large blocks of memory, but random access requires following links from the head, making it slower.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recognise that arrays use contiguous memory and fixed indexing, while linked lists use separate nodes linked by pointers.Step 2: Note that arrays are typically allocated with a fixed size at creation, limiting how much they can grow without reallocation.Step 3: Understand that linked lists allocate nodes dynamically, allowing the list to grow or shrink as needed.Step 4: Recall that arrays provide constant time random access by index, whereas linked lists require linear traversal to reach a given position.Step 5: Recognise that insertion and deletion in the middle of a linked list can be efficient once the position is known, because only pointers change, while arrays require shifting subsequent elements.
Verification / Alternative check:
In code examples, accessing array[i] is compiled into a base address plus index times element size, reflecting contiguous storage. For a linked list, accessing the ith element involves a loop that follows next pointers i times. Benchmarks confirm that arrays excel at random access and memory locality, while linked lists perform well for frequent insertions and deletions when pointers are managed correctly. These observations align with the conceptual differences described above.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B incorrectly restricts data types for arrays and linked lists; both can store many types depending on the language. Option C reverses behaviour by claiming that linked lists cannot grow and arrays always resize automatically, which is false in low level languages. Option D claims there is no practical difference, ignoring the well known trade offs that form the basis of many exam questions. These options do not accurately reflect standard definitions from data structure theory.
Common Pitfalls:
A common pitfall is assuming that linked lists are always better because they allow dynamic size. In practice, arrays benefit from better cache locality and may outperform lists in many scenarios. Another mistake is forgetting the overhead of storing pointers in each node and the complexity of correct pointer manipulation. Experienced developers evaluate access patterns and memory constraints before choosing between arrays, linked lists, or higher level containers such as vectors and lists in modern libraries.
Final Answer:
Correct answer: A linked list uses dynamically allocated nodes linked by pointers, while an array uses contiguous memory with fixed size indexing
Discussion & Comments