Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: The page directive include performs a static include at translation time, merging the included JSP into the parent page, whereas the <jsp:include> action performs a dynamic include at request time and can include updated content
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
JavaServer Pages provide two different mechanisms for including one file inside another: the page directive include and the jsp include action tag. Both are used to reuse common headers, footers, or reusable fragments, but they work at different stages of the JSP life cycle. Understanding this distinction is important for performance and maintainability of web applications. This question focuses on the fundamental difference between static and dynamic inclusion in JSP.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The page directive include is a static include. During the JSP translation phase, before compilation into a servlet, the contents of the included file are merged into the parent JSP as if they were part of a single source file. This means that changes to the included JSP require recompilation to take effect. The jsp include action tag is a dynamic include. It executes at request time and forwards the request to the included resource, then inserts the response output into the parent page. As a result, updates to the included resource are reflected immediately without recompiling the parent.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that <%@ include %> causes the JSP engine to merge source files at translation time, so the result is one larger servlet.Step 2: Recognize that this static inclusion is similar to a textual copy and paste and improves performance because there is only one servlet to execute.Step 3: Recall that <jsp:include> invokes another resource during the processing of each request and inserts that resource output into the response.Step 4: Understand that this dynamic inclusion allows the included resource to be updated independently and recompiled separately from the parent JSP.Step 5: Conclude that the key difference is translation time static inclusion versus request time dynamic inclusion.
Verification / Alternative check:
To verify this behaviour, consider a JSP that uses the page directive include to pull in a header. If you change the header file on disk, the change may not appear until the container detects modification and recompiles the combined JSP. With the jsp include action, editing the included JSP has an immediate effect on future requests because the container executes it separately on each request. Performance profiling also shows that static includes avoid some overhead associated with repeated dispatching.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option B is incorrect because it claims both mechanisms are dynamic and identical, which ignores the important translation time versus request time difference. Option C is wrong because both mechanisms can include other JSP files, not only specific file types like HTML or compiled classes. Option D is incorrect because both constructs are part of JSP, not generic servlets or plain HTML pages, and they are not limited in the way described.
Common Pitfalls:
Developers sometimes use dynamic includes where static includes would be simpler and more efficient, leading to unnecessary overhead. Another pitfall is assuming that updating an included file will always update all pages immediately, which is not true for static includes that have already been compiled. Understanding when each inclusion technique runs helps in making better design decisions and avoiding confusing bugs.
Final Answer:
The main difference is that the page directive include performs a static include at translation time, merging the included JSP into the parent page, whereas the <jsp:include> action performs a dynamic include at request time and can include updated content, which is option A.
Discussion & Comments