Arrange the following English words in strict dictionary (alphabetical) order: (1) Convincae, (2) Converge, (3) Convenience, (4) Convalesca, (5) Converse. Choose the lexicographic sequence from smallest to largest.
-
A4, 3, 1, 2, 5
-
B4, 1, 3, 2, 5
-
C3, 4, 1, 2, 5
-
D4, 3, 2, 5, 1
-
ENone of these
Answer
Correct Answer: 4, 3, 1, 2, 5
Explanation
Introduction / Context:This problem asks you to arrange five near-homographic words in dictionary order. Such items test attention to character-by-character comparison and common prefixes. Though a couple of spellings look unusual (e.g., “Convincae,” “Convalesca”), the task remains a straightforward lexicographic sequence challenge: compare letters from left to right until a difference appears.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Words: Convalesca (4), Convincae (1), Convenience (3), Converge (2), Converse (5).
- We use case-insensitive, standard English alphabetical order.
- No semantic meaning is required; pure character ordering is used.
Concept / Approach:All words share the prefix “conv-”. Compare the subsequent letters carefully: conva..., conve..., convi..., converge, converse. The first divergence decides the order. Specifically: “conva...” comes before “conve...”; “conve...” comes before “convi...”; within “conver-”, “converge” comes before “converse”.
Step-by-Step Solution:Compare initial groups: “conva” vs “conve” vs “convi” vs “converge” vs “converse”.Earliest is “Convalesca” (4) because “a” < “e”.Next is “Convenience” (3) because “e” < “i”.Then “Convincae” (1) because “i” precedes any “r” in “conver-”.Between “Converge” (2) and “Converse” (5), “g” < “s”, so 2 precedes 5.Hence the order is 4, 3, 1, 2, 5.
Verification / Alternative check:Write the words stacked and align each position: conva..., conve..., convi..., converg..., convers.... Progressively compare the first different letter; the above order is stable and unique under standard lexicographic rules.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- Any option placing “convi” before “conve” violates e < i.
- Any option placing “convers-” before “converg-” violates g < s.
- Any option putting “conve” before “conva” violates a < e.
Common Pitfalls:Skimming past the first differing character or assuming semantic similarity implies order. Always compare letter-by-letter for near-identical prefixes.
Final Answer:4, 3, 1, 2, 5