Rubber processing: which listed device is most suitable for devulcanising rubber scrap and for preparing rubber dispersions/solutions?

Introduction / Context:
Devulcanisation breaks sulphur cross-links in vulcanised rubber to reclaim and reuse rubber. Preparing stable water dispersions (latex-like) or solvent-based rubber solutions requires intense shear and specialized machines, not just generic mixers or separators.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• Goal 1: devulcanise scrap rubber (reverse cross-linking).
• Goal 2: produce water dispersions or rubber solutions.
• Choices: Banbury-type mixer, propeller agitator, Sharples centrifuge, or none of these.

Concept / Approach:
Practical devulcanisation uses dedicated devulcanisers (e.g., reclaimers, two-roll cracker mills, pan grinders) and chemical/thermal–mechanical processes with peptisers. Creating dispersions uses colloid mills, high-pressure homogenisers, or dissolvers with strong shear—quite different from the listed devices.

Step-by-Step Solution:
Banbury mixer: excellent for compounding raw rubber with fillers but not a devulcaniser and not ideal for fine dispersions.Propeller agitator: provides mild mixing; insufficient shear for devulcanisation or stable fine dispersions.Sharples centrifuge: a separator; does not devulcanise or dissolve rubber.Hence, among the options given, the correct choice is “none of these.”

Verification / Alternative check:
Industrial reclaim lines typically specify cracker mills, refiner mills, and chemical reclaiming; dispersion lines specify colloid/homogeniser equipment—none of which appear among the listed options.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Banbury: mixing/compounding only.Propeller: inadequate shear.Sharples: separation, not reaction or dissolution.

Common Pitfalls:
Assuming any “mixer” can devulcanise; confusing dispersion formation with mere agitation.

Final Answer:
none of these