Trace moisture in organic systems: Which analytical method is suitable for detecting a small amount of water present in predominantly organic liquids or solutions?

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Dielectric constant and loss factor method

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Controlling trace moisture in organic media is vital for polymerisation, esterification, and solvent-based processing. Even parts-per-million water can poison catalysts or change product quality. Several analytical strategies exist; the one chosen must respond specifically and sensitively in non-conducting organic matrices.



Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Matrix is mostly organic (low intrinsic conductivity and high resistivity).
  • Water content is small (trace-level detection desired).
  • Online or laboratory measurement is acceptable.


Concept / Approach:
Water has a high dielectric constant and distinct dielectric loss behaviour compared with many organic solvents. Measuring dielectric constant and loss factor at an appropriate frequency allows sensitive detection of small changes in moisture content. This principle underlies capacitance moisture meters and microwave/loss-factor probes widely used in organic systems. While Karl Fischer titration is a classic laboratory method, it is not among the given choices; within the options, the dielectric constant and loss factor method best fits trace moisture detection in non-conductive organics.



Step-by-Step Solution:

Recognise organics have low baseline conductivity → conductivity is insensitive.Use water’s dielectric contrast against organic matrices.Measure capacitance/loss; correlate with water ppm via calibration.


Verification / Alternative check:
Process analyzers using RF/microwave probes correlate permittivity with water content; calibration curves demonstrate ppm-level sensitivity for many solvents.



Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Electrical conductivity: Organics are non-conductive; trace water changes are poorly resolved.
  • Polarimetry: Measures optical rotation of chiral solutes, not water.
  • Emission spectroscopy: Not selective for water in liquids without complex sample prep.
  • Refractometry only: Refractive index changes are small and non-specific for trace water.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming a universal calibration across different solvents; dielectric-based methods require matrix-specific calibration curves.


Final Answer:
Dielectric constant and loss factor method

More Questions from Process Control and Instrumentation

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion