Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: It is the process of evaluating a system for vulnerabilities by attempting to exploit weaknesses in authentication, authorisation, configuration and data handling in order to assess and improve security posture.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Security testing and penetration testing are critical in today's environment of frequent cyber attacks and data breaches. This interview question checks whether you understand the purpose of actively searching for weaknesses before attackers do. Knowing the goal and scope of penetration testing helps testers collaborate effectively with security specialists and interpret their findings.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- The system handles sensitive data or critical business operations.
- Attackers may try to exploit misconfigurations, code flaws or weak authentication.
- Penetration testing simulates attacker techniques within a controlled environment.
- The question is conceptual and does not require specific tool commands.
Concept / Approach:
Security testing is a broad term for verifying that a system protects data and functions from unauthorised access, misuse and attacks. Penetration testing is a focused activity where a tester, often called an ethical hacker, intentionally tries to exploit vulnerabilities. Typical checks include injection flaws, broken access control, insecure direct object references, misconfigured servers and weak encryption. The aim is not to cause harm but to discover weaknesses so that they can be fixed before real attackers exploit them.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that penetration testing is associated with actively attempting to exploit weaknesses.
Step 2: Examine options for references to vulnerabilities, authentication, authorisation and data handling.
Step 3: Option a explicitly mentions evaluating vulnerabilities by attempting to exploit weaknesses, which matches standard definitions.
Step 4: Confirm that the other options do not refer to security concerns at all.
Step 5: Select option a as the correct description.
Verification / Alternative check:
As an alternative check, think about common security standards. They emphasise processes such as vulnerability scanning, penetration testing and code review to find issues like injection and broken access control. Option a fits well within this process. Options b, c and d are clearly unrelated to security goals, confirming that option a is correct.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option b talks about branding compliance, which is unrelated to security. Option c confuses performance testing with security testing. Option d refers to documentation proofreading rather than system protection. None of these address vulnerabilities or attempts to exploit them, so they cannot be correct answers for this question.
Common Pitfalls:
A common mistake is thinking that running an automated vulnerability scanner once is sufficient. Real penetration testing also includes manual exploration and creative attack paths. Another pitfall is performing penetration tests only at the end of a project, when there is little time to fix deep issues. Integrating security considerations throughout development and scheduling regular tests is far more effective.
Final Answer:
It is the process of evaluating a system for vulnerabilities by attempting to exploit weaknesses in authentication, authorisation, configuration and data handling in order to assess and improve security posture.
Discussion & Comments