Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: It will result in a compile time error.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
This question targets reference binding rules in C++. Non-const lvalue references (int&) cannot bind to temporaries (rvalues). Using a post-increment expression as a reference initializer creates such a temporary, triggering a compilation error.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The initializer for x is m++ which is an rvalue; a non-const lvalue reference cannot bind to it. The same applies to y. Modern C++ permits binding a const reference to a temporary, but not a non-const reference. Therefore compilation fails before any runtime output is possible.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Verification / Alternative check:
Replacing with const int &x = m++; and const int &y = n++; would compile (binding to temporaries allowed for const refs), though subsequent ++ uses would fail due to constness.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming references can bind to any expression; confusing lvalues and rvalues; forgetting the special rule for const references to temporaries.
Final Answer:
It will result in a compile time error.
Discussion & Comments