When planning to convert to a computer-based system, which considerations should management evaluate? Select the most complete set.

Introduction / Context:
System conversion is a high-stakes transition. Management must balance functional fit, performance, and ongoing support to minimize risk and disruption. This question asks for the most complete set of considerations at planning time.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• The organization is moving from a non-computerized or legacy system to a new computer-based solution.
• Compatibility, performance, and support are critical to success.
• Total cost of ownership includes license, maintenance, and operational capacity.

Concept / Approach:
Evaluating available software ensures functional fit and integration possibilities. Vendor maintenance affects uptime, patches, and security. CPU size and speed must meet throughput/latency targets under expected concurrency. Ignoring any of these increases the risk of failure during and after conversion.

Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Ensure software capability and roadmap match requirements.2) Confirm support SLAs, response times, and escalation paths.3) Size compute resources for peak demand and growth.4) Conclude that all listed considerations are valid and necessary.

Verification / Alternative check:
Pilots and performance benchmarks can validate sizing and vendor claims before full rollout, reducing conversion risks.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Picking only one element underestimates the multi-dimensional nature of successful conversion.

Common Pitfalls:
Under-sizing infrastructure; overlooking vendor lock-in; neglecting maintenance costs and patch cadence.

Final Answer:
All of the above are legitimate considerations.