Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: if only assumption II is implicit.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The statement positions consumer satisfaction as a prerequisite for success under liberalisation and competition. The task is to identify which background belief must be true for the claim to make sense.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Assumption II—consumer satisfaction being the most reliable “investment” in competitive settings—is embedded in the statement’s logic: without placing consumer satisfaction at the centre of firm strategy, the assertion “must satisfy to succeed” loses bite. Assumption I (few firms care) is neither stated nor necessary; even if many firms pursue satisfaction, the prescription still holds at the firm level.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Test I: Irrelevant to the argument’s necessity; prevalence across firms does not matter.Test II: If consumer satisfaction were not crucial in competition, the statement’s claim would fail. Hence II is implicit.
Verification / Alternative check:
In competitive markets, buyer choice disciplines suppliers; strategies that maximise satisfaction tend to drive retention and growth.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Either” or “neither” misreads the normative logic; I alone is off-target.
Common Pitfalls:
Reading sector-wide prevalence (I) as a required premise for a normative prescription.
Final Answer:
Only Assumption II is implicit.
Discussion & Comments