Difficulty: Medium
Correct Answer: Because many people in France did not want a restored absolute monarchy and resented the return of conservative rule.
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
The Congress of Vienna met after the defeat of Napoleon to redraw the map of Europe and restore stability. Its leaders favoured conservative principles such as restoring old royal families and limiting the spread of revolutionary ideas. In France, this meant the return of the Bourbon monarchy. However, many French people had experienced the French Revolution and Napoleonic reforms and no longer accepted absolute monarchy. This tension between conservative restoration and popular expectations helped fuel later revolts.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The Congress of Vienna aimed to restore what leaders saw as legitimate monarchies and to create a balance of power that would discourage another large scale European war. In France, this meant restoring the Bourbon kings and trying to reverse some revolutionary changes. Many people, especially in the middle class and among urban workers, wanted constitutional limits, civil rights and national representation rather than a full return to old style absolute monarchy. When rulers tried to govern in a conservative and restrictive way, protests and revolts broke out in France and other parts of Europe. Therefore, the correct explanation is that people did not want a return to absolute monarchy and reacted against conservative restoration.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Step 1: Recall that the Congress of Vienna represented conservative forces such as Austria under Metternich.Step 2: Remember that in France the Bourbon monarchy was restored after Napoleon.Step 3: Consider how many French citizens, influenced by revolutionary ideas, were unhappy with attempts to roll back reforms.Step 4: Examine the answer choices and look for the one that mentions opposition to absolute monarchy and conservative rule.Step 5: Reject any option claiming that people wanted absolute monarchy, because that contradicts the spread of liberal and constitutional ideas.Step 6: Reject options that say there were no revolts or that monarchies were abolished completely, because both are historically inaccurate.
Verification / Alternative check:
Later events in French and European history confirm this interpretation. France experienced the Revolution of 1830 and again in 1848, both of which challenged conservative monarchies. More broadly, the period after 1815 saw repeated uprisings across Europe, often inspired by liberal and nationalist goals that clashed with the conservative order created at Vienna. This pattern shows that many people did not accept a simple return to old absolute monarchy, verifying the logic behind the correct option.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Option A is wrong because it reverses the situation; a large segment of the French population did not want absolute monarchy restored in its traditional form. Option B misstates the outcome, suggesting that the Congress successfully prevented abuse of power and therefore avoided revolt, when in reality conservative policies helped provoke unrest. Option D is completely incorrect, as the Congress of Vienna did not abolish monarchies but instead restored them in many places.
Common Pitfalls:
A common misunderstanding is to focus only on the side of kings and diplomats, assuming that their decisions simply brought stability. Another pitfall is to overlook how much attitudes had changed after the French Revolution, making people less willing to accept unlimited royal power. To avoid these mistakes, think of Vienna as a conservative response that could not fully suppress rising liberal ideas, and remember that this clash led to revolts.
Final Answer:
The Congress of Vienna led to revolts in France because many people did not want a restored absolute monarchy and resented the return of conservative rule.
Discussion & Comments