Change file permissions for names starting with 'emp' and ending with 1, 2, or 3 so that the user (owner) gains execute permission: which chmod command is appropriate?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: chmod u+x emp[1-3]

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Managing permissions in Unix/Linux often involves applying changes to sets of files selected by shell globs. Understanding chmod symbolic modes and bracket patterns ensures precise, minimal changes to the correct targets without over-permissive settings.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Target files are named 'emp1', 'emp2', or 'emp3' (i.e., start with 'emp' and end with 1–3).
  • Goal: add execute permission for the user (owner) only.
  • We prefer symbolic mode for clarity (u+x).


Concept / Approach:

The shell glob emp[1-3] matches exactly the names ending in 1, 2, or 3. The chmod symbolic form u+x adds execute permission to the owner without altering group or others. Combining them gives chmod u+x emp[1-3], which is specific and safe.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Select files by pattern: emp[1-3].Decide permission change: add execute to user = u+x.Run: chmod u+x emp[1-3].Verify with: ls -l emp[1-3].


Verification / Alternative check:

Run stat emp1 before and after to confirm mode changes only for the user execute bit. If scripts are in these files, test execution with ./emp1 (assuming proper shebang and path).


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • chmod 777 emp*: over-permissive, affects many files, not just 1–3, and changes group/others unnecessarily.
  • chmod u+r ??? emp: malformed; adds read, not execute; and incorrect glob usage.
  • chmod 222 emp?: sets write-only for user/group/others; also matches any single extra character, not just 1–3.
  • None of the above: incorrect since the correct command is listed.


Common Pitfalls:

  • Using * and modifying too many files.
  • Confusing symbolic and octal modes.


Final Answer:

chmod u+x emp[1-3].

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion