Decision tables: which rules are good practice when constructing a decision table for business logic?

Introduction / Context:
Decision tables compactly represent complex conditional logic. To be unambiguous and maintainable, they must follow clear construction rules regarding naming, structure, and notation.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• We are documenting business rules with multiple conditions and actions.
• Clarity and consistency are priorities.

Concept / Approach:
Effective decision tables (1) have a named decision scope, (2) list conditions and exhaustive rule combinations, and (3) specify actions tied to each rule. Standardized notation prevents misinterpretation, and action execution order follows the process design.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
Peer reviews and rule-coverage tests validate completeness and consistency.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Any single rule alone is insufficient; all are recommended, hence “All of the above.”

Common Pitfalls:
Missing rule combinations; overlapping actions; inconsistent terminology leading to defects.

Final Answer:
All of the above