In computer hardware maintenance, Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) typically causes the most damage to which component, and why are its internal parts especially vulnerable compared to other peripherals?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: Expansion board

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
ESD (Electrostatic Discharge) is a sudden flow of electricity between two charged objects. In computer servicing and assembly, understanding which parts are most vulnerable is essential to prevent invisible, cumulative damage that leads to intermittent faults or total failure.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Typical PC components considered: power supply, expansion board, monitor, and keyboard.
  • Normal bench environment without specialized ionization unless stated.
  • Human body can carry thousands of volts of static charge that discharge upon contact.


Concept / Approach:
ESD damage correlates with the presence of small-geometry semiconductor junctions and exposed circuitry. Components with dense ICs, unshielded traces, and direct handling risk are more susceptible. Expansion boards (e.g., graphics, NIC, sound cards) have numerous sensitive ICs and edge connectors directly touched during installation, making them prime ESD targets.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Identify components with sensitive semiconductor devices: expansion boards contain GPUs, ASICs, memory, and logic ICs.2) Consider handling patterns: technicians frequently touch expansion boards at contacts and components during installation, increasing ESD exposure.3) Contrast with power supplies: PSUs have primary-side isolation, robust filtering, and metal enclosures that reduce direct ESD impact on sensitive parts.4) Contrast with monitor and keyboard: these peripherals are usually enclosed and less often handled at the board level during routine tasks.5) Conclude that expansion boards experience the highest combination of sensitivity and direct handling risk.


Verification / Alternative check:
Service guides and ESD handling standards emphasize antistatic bags, wrist straps, and grounded mats specifically when handling PCBs and add-in cards, confirming their heightened susceptibility.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

  • Power supply: Typically shielded, with fewer direct-contact ICs exposed during routine handling.
  • Monitor: Enclosed; ESD rarely affects internal boards unless opened.
  • Keyboard: Contains simple circuitry and is externally insulated.
  • None of the above: Incorrect because expansion boards are clearly vulnerable.


Common Pitfalls:
Assuming visible sparks are needed for damage (latent ESD can occur below human perception), and touching card contacts without grounding.


Final Answer:
Expansion board

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion