Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: will more closely match the capabilities of the human eye
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Computer vision systems depend on sensor hardware (imagers) and processing. As fabrication processes advance, vision sensors gain resolution, dynamic range, frame rate, and on-chip processing. Combined with better optics and algorithms, these sensors steadily approach aspects of human visual capability in detection, recognition, and robustness to lighting variation.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Key human-like attributes include high dynamic range, low-light sensitivity, motion capture without rolling artifacts, and rapid adaptation. Advances like back-side illumination, larger pixel wells, per-pixel ADC, and event-based sensors all push machine vision closer to these characteristics. Meanwhile, embedded AI enables local inference, reducing latency and bandwidth needs.
Step-by-Step Solution:
Assess likely improvements: sensitivity, HDR, speed, and embedded intelligence.Compare to human vision benchmarks (adaptation, dynamic range).Conclude that future sensors will more closely match human-eye-like performance.
Verification / Alternative check:
Commercial trends—automotive ADAS cameras, industrial inspection with HDR, event cameras for high-speed scenes—demonstrate the trajectory toward human-comparable or superior performance in specific dimensions.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
“Will remain very costly” is not universally true as mass adoption reduces cost. “Cannot improve much” contradicts observed innovation pace. “All of the above” cannot be correct because the first two are inaccurate generalizations.
Common Pitfalls:
Assuming a single metric defines capability; vision performance is multi-dimensional (resolution, SNR, dynamic range, latency).
Final Answer:
will more closely match the capabilities of the human eye
Discussion & Comments