Heat conduction through a two-layer composite slab (equal thicknesses) Two layers of different materials with conductivities k1 and k2 are placed in series; each layer has the same thickness. What is the equivalent thermal conductivity of the composite slab?
-
Ak_eq = (k1 + k2) / 2
-
Bk_eq = 2 * k1 * k2 / (k1 + k2)
-
Ck_eq = k1 * k2
-
Dk_eq = (k1^2 + k2^2) / (k1 + k2)
-
Ek_eq = sqrt(k1 * k2)
Answer
Correct Answer: k_eq = 2 * k1 * k2 / (k1 + k2)
Explanation
Introduction / Context:Composite walls are common in insulation and heat-exchanger design. Determining an equivalent thermal conductivity allows engineers to treat multiple layers as a single homogeneous slab for steady, one-dimensional conduction.
Given Data / Assumptions:
- Two layers in series, equal thickness L for each.
- Thermal conductivities: k1 and k2.
- Same cross-sectional area A; steady 1-D conduction; contact resistance neglected.
Concept / Approach:The total thermal resistance in series adds: R_total = L/(k1A) + L/(k2A). Define an equivalent single slab of thickness 2L and conductivity k_eq such that R_total = 2L/(k_eqA).
Step-by-Step Solution:R_total = L/(k1A) + L/(k2A) = (L/A) * (1/k1 + 1/k2).Set 2L/(k_eqA) = (L/A) * (1/k1 + 1/k2).Divide by L/A: 2/k_eq = 1/k1 + 1/k2.Solve for k_eq: k_eq = 2k1k2 / (k1 + k2).
Verification / Alternative check:Check symmetry: if k1 = k2 = k, then k_eq = 2kk/(2k) = k, as expected.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
- (k1 + k2)/2 and sqrt(k1k2) are for parallel or other averaging concepts, not series conduction with equal thickness.
- k1*k2 and (k1^2 + k2^2)/(k1 + k2) do not satisfy resistance addition.
Common Pitfalls:Confusing series and parallel arrangements; forgetting that thickness doubles in the equivalent single-layer model.
Final Answer:k_eq = 2 * k1 * k2 / (k1 + k2)