Conductor sizing perspective: Compare total copper cross-section requirements (in terms of current-carrying capacity) for supplying a 120 V system with an effective load resistance of 15 Ω using single-phase versus three-phase arrangements.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: single-phase 16 A; three-phase 8 A

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
For a given power delivery, three-phase systems can reduce the total copper required compared with single-phase systems. This is because power sharing across three conductors lowers current per conductor for the same delivered power, improving material efficiency. The question reframes this as a comparison of 'current-carrying capacity' totals needed in single-phase versus three-phase at 120 V for an effective 15 Ω load.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Nominal voltage of 120 V.
  • Effective load resistance R_eff = 15 Ω (same delivered power criterion).
  • Balanced three-phase; neglect line resistance and power factor differences (assume resistive).


Concept / Approach:

Single-phase current: I_1φ = V / R_eff = 120 / 15 = 8 A. Two conductors carry this current (go and return), so total copper ampacity perspective doubles that to a 'sum-current' of 16 A. For a comparable three-phase arrangement delivering the same power at 120 V per line-to-line (or appropriately arranged so each phase carries lower current for the same total power), each line requires less ampacity; the net 'sum-current' can be considered about half for the same delivered power, giving 8 A as the comparable total.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Single-phase: I = 8 A in two conductors ⇒ total 16 A of 'ampacity' across conductors.Three-phase: power sharing among three conductors reduces required ampacity total to roughly half for the same delivered power in this simplified comparison ⇒ about 8 A.Therefore, the closest paired choice is 'single-phase 16 A; three-phase 8 A'.


Verification / Alternative check:

Using equal copper criterion and balanced loads, three-phase systems are known to be more copper-efficient for the same power and voltage class. While exact values depend on line-to-line vs line-to-neutral voltage and connection details, the qualitative reduction is consistent.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

'8 A; 4 A' and '32 A; 16 A' scale by factors that do not match the standard comparison. '16 A; 0 A' is impossible since current must flow in all active conductors.


Common Pitfalls:

Comparing peak vs rms values; mixing line-to-line and line-to-neutral definitions; ignoring that single-phase needs two current-carrying conductors, impacting total copper cross-section.


Final Answer:

single-phase 16 A; three-phase 8 A

More Questions from Three-Phase Systems in Power Applications

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion