Coke formation tendencies: Choose the correct statement about coking in refinery/thermal processes considering molecular weight, pressure effects, and reaction heat.

Difficulty: Medium

Correct Answer: Coking tendency increases with increasing molecular weight.

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
“Coking” refers to the formation of solid carbonaceous material in thermal and catalytic processes (e.g., visbreaking, coking, FCC). It deactivates catalysts, plugs equipment, and reduces liquid yields. Understanding factors that drive coking helps in selecting severity and feed quality windows.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • Comparison across hydrocarbon feeds from light naphtha to residua.
  • General trends rather than unit-specific anomalies.
  • Reaction heat refers here to net heat effects of the overall pathway to solid carbon.


Concept / Approach:
Heavier feeds (higher molecular weight, higher Conradson carbon/asphaltenes) contain more precursors for condensation and polyaromatic growth, thus showing stronger coking propensity. Pressure effects are complex and unit-dependent; “always enhances coke formation” is too absolute. Coking itself results from polymerisation/condensation and dehydrogenation steps; while cracking is endothermic, overall pathways to carbon are not characterised simply as exothermic in specifications. Moisture control helps but does not “eliminate” coking when heavy precursors are present.


Step-by-Step Solution:

1) Compare feeds: resid > gasoils > naphtha in coking tendency.2) Link to property: higher molecular weight and asphaltenes increase condensation to coke.3) Evaluate pressure: no universal “higher pressure → more coke” rule; depends on kinetics and volatility.4) Evaluate reaction heat: oversimplified to label coking as exothermic across contexts.5) Conclude (a) is the sound general statement.


Verification / Alternative check:
Unit operations literature correlates coke make with feed CCR/asphaltenes and severity; heavy feeds inherently show greater coke formation under similar severities.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

(b) Opposite of observed trend.(c) Overly absolute; pressure effects vary.(d) Mischaracterises complex pathways; cracking endothermy coexists with condensation sequences.(e) Drying feed reduces foaming/emulsions but not intrinsic coking propensity.


Common Pitfalls:
Treating a multivariate phenomenon with single-factor absolutes; always consider feed CCR, asphaltenes, and severity together.


Final Answer:
Coking tendency increases with increasing molecular weight.

More Questions from Petroleum Refinery Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion