Data Sufficiency — Coding (“one”) How is the word “one” coded? I. “one of its kind” → zo pi ko fe; “in kind and cash” → ga to ru ko. II. “its point for origin” → ba le fe mi; “make a point a clear” → yu si mi de. III. “make money and cash” → to mi ru hy; “money of various kind” → qu ko zo hy.

Introduction / Context:
We must map words↔codes by intersecting phrases.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• I pairs {one, of, its, kind} with {zo, pi, ko, fe}; and “in kind and cash” with {ga, to, ru, ko} ⇒ “kind” ↔ ko by intersection; thus {zo, pi, fe} map to {one, of, its} in some order.
• II involves none of {one, of} explicitly (except “its” appears giving fe), but does not isolate “one”.
• III gives overlap “cash” (ru/to) and “money”, “of”, “kind” with new codes; “of” intersects I and III to disambiguate.

Concept / Approach:
Use intersections to fix unique mappings. From I we know ko=kind and fe=its (since “its” appears in I and II: “its” maps to fe). Then in I the remaining {zo, pi} are {one, of}. Using III (“money of various kind” → qu ko zo hy) with ko=kind fixes “of”→zo, hence “one”→pi.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Why Other Options Are Wrong:
I alone leaves two candidates for “one”; II alone irrelevant; III alone insufficient. I+III together suffice; all three not required.

Final Answer:
“one” is coded as pi; sufficiency: I and III together.