Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Oxy-acetylene welding
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
Cr–Mo steels are used in pressure vessels and high-temperature piping. Welding procedure selection is critical to avoid cracking, embrittlement, or deleterious microstructures (e.g., martensite without proper tempering). This question targets the commonly avoided process for these alloys.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
Oxy-acetylene welding produces a carburizing or oxidizing flame depending on adjustment and has relatively high heat input with poor control for critical alloys, leading to undesirable microstructures and risk of cracking in Cr–Mo steels. Arc welding processes with controlled electrodes/procedures and preheat/PWHT are preferred. Thermit and resistance welding are specialized but can be engineered appropriately; oxy-acetylene is generally discouraged for Cr–Mo pressure components.
Step-by-Step Solution:
List candidate processes and typical metallurgy impacts.Recognize oxy-acetylene flame chemistry and heat profile as unfavorable for Cr–Mo.Industry practice: use SMAW/GTAW/GMAW with qualified procedures, not oxy-acetylene.Select 'Oxy-acetylene welding' as the process to avoid.
Verification / Alternative check:
Coding standards (e.g., ASME) and manufacturer WPSs rarely qualify oxy-fuel welding for Cr–Mo pressure parts, reflecting metallurgical risks and lack of control compared with arc processes.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Thermit/resistance welding may be used in niche applications with proper controls; they are not categorically prohibited like oxy-acetylene for these alloys.
Common Pitfalls:
Final Answer:
Oxy-acetylene welding
Discussion & Comments