Ignition quality reference scale (diesel): On the historical cetane number scale for compression-ignition fuels, the reference value assigned to alpha-methylnaphthalene is taken as what?

Difficulty: Easy

Correct Answer: 0

Explanation:


Introduction / Context:
Cetane number quantifies diesel fuel ignition quality. The scale originally used two reference hydrocarbons: n-cetane (high ignition quality) and alpha-methylnaphthalene (poor ignition quality). Understanding the endpoints of this scale is foundational in fuel testing.


Given Data / Assumptions:

  • CFR engine test methods define cetane number.
  • Original references: n-cetane (assigned 100) and alpha-methylnaphthalene (assigned 0).
  • Modern practice often uses heptamethylnonane (isocetane) as a 15 reference, but the 0-point legacy still appears in exams.


Concept / Approach:
The conventional historical assignment places alpha-methylnaphthalene at the zero point due to its very poor auto-ignition tendency in CI engines, thereby setting the lower bound of the cetane scale. This provides a linear reference between poor and excellent ignition fuels for calibration and comparison.


Step-by-Step Solution:

Recall scale anchors: alpha-methylnaphthalene = 0; n-cetane = 100.Relate scale meaning: higher cetane number → shorter ignition delay.Select the zero assignment for alpha-methylnaphthalene.


Verification / Alternative check:
Standards literature notes the later substitution of isocetane (15) for handling reasons, but the original 0 assignment for alpha-methylnaphthalene remains the canonical teaching point.


Why Other Options Are Wrong:

100: reserved for n-cetane, the high-quality reference fuel.50: arbitrary midpoint, not a reference assignment.Infinite: not meaningful in this scale.15: relates to isocetane, not alpha-methylnaphthalene.


Common Pitfalls:
Confusing the updated reference pair (isocetane 15) with the historical zero point; the question explicitly names alpha-methylnaphthalene.


Final Answer:
0

More Questions from Petroleum Refinery Engineering

Discussion & Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Join Discussion