Difficulty: Easy
Correct Answer: Incorrect
Explanation:
Introduction / Context:
In oblique projection, two common conventions are used: the cavalier method and the cabinet method. Understanding how depth (the receding axis) is scaled in each method is fundamental for accurate freehand sketches and CAD drawings that communicate shape without misleading distortion.
Given Data / Assumptions:
Concept / Approach:
The distinction between cavalier and cabinet focuses on the scale applied to the receding axis. Cavalier keeps the depth axis at 1:1 (full scale), while cabinet reduces it to 1:2 (half scale) to visually temper distortion. Circles on planes parallel to the projection plane remain true circles; those on receding planes appear as ellipses.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1) Identify projection family: given as "cavalier".2) Recall the rule: cavalier uses full-scale depth; cabinet uses half-scale depth.3) Compare with the statement claiming "half scale" for cavalier.4) Since half scale pertains to cabinet, the statement is incorrect.
Verification / Alternative check:
Quick mnemonic: "Cabinet cuts depth" (C-a-b-i-n-e-t → C-u-t). Therefore, cabinet halves the receding dimension; cavalier does not.
Why Other Options Are Wrong:
Common Pitfalls:
Confusing cabinet with cavalier; assuming any foreshortening value is acceptable; forgetting that axes parallel to the projection plane remain true size while the receding axis may be scaled by convention.
Final Answer:
Incorrect
Discussion & Comments