In C programming, determine the output of this program using a union of int and char[2].\n\n#include <stdio.h>\n\nint main()\n{\n union A {\n int i;\n char ch[2];\n };\n union A u;\n u.ch[0] = 3;\n u.ch[1] = 2;\n printf("%d, %d, %d\n", u.ch[0], u.ch[1], u.i);\n return 0;\n}\n

Introduction / Context:
This question tests understanding of unions, byte ordering (endianness), and how writing to a char array inside a union affects the overlapping int member in C.

Given Data / Assumptions:

• union A has two members: int i and char ch[2].
• Assignments: ch[0] = 3 and ch[1] = 2.
• Output prints ch[0], ch[1], and i in that order.
• Assume a typical little-endian environment with 16-bit int for the classic result (as on many older compilers used in such questions).

Concept / Approach:
In a union, all members share the same memory. On little-endian systems, the least significant byte is stored at the lowest address. With a 16-bit int, ch[0] maps to the low byte of i and ch[1] maps to the high byte of i. Therefore i = ch[0] + ch[1]256 = 3 + 2256 = 515.

Step-by-Step Solution:

Verification / Alternative check:
If int is 32-bit little-endian, the low two bytes would still be 03 and 02, giving i = 515 with higher bytes 0. Hence the printed value for i remains 515 on common little-endian systems.

Why Other Options Are Wrong:

• 515, 2, 3: Reorders fields; the program prints ch[0], ch[1], then i.
• 3, 2, 5: Ignores byte significance; 2256 is not 2.
• 2, 3, 515: Swaps ch indexes; program does not do that.

Common Pitfalls:
Confusing endianness (big-endian would differ), assuming unions copy rather than overlay, or assuming chars sign-extend into the int. Here bytes are combined by position, not sign extension.

Final Answer:
3, 2, 515